Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd. v. Jiangmen Lianyi Trading Co., Ltd. et al
| Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd. |
| Jiangmen Lianyi Trading Co., Ltd. and Jingpei Han |
| 1:2024cv03024 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jiangmen Lianyi Trading Co., Ltd. and Jingpei Han, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd...(Zhu, Kai) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd...(Zhu, Kai) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Zhu, Kai) |
| Filing 2 AO 121 FORM COPYRIGHT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 121 Form Copyright for case opening submitted to court for review..(Zhu, Kai) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jingpei Han, Jiangmen Lianyi Trading Co., Ltd.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29248594)Document filed by Quanzhou Kodyhome Products Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit DMCA Counternotice, #2 Exhibit Copyright Registration, #3 Exhibit Copyright License Agreement, #4 Exhibit Plaintiff's Product, #5 Exhibit Plaintiff's Product).(Zhu, Kai) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
