Marino v. Siegel & Reiner, LLP et al
| J. Richard Marino |
| Siegel & Reiner, LLP and Glenn A. Reiner |
| Richard H. Del Valle |
| 1:2024cv03041 |
| April 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Mary Kay Vyskocil |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 m Diversity: Legal Malpractice |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Richard H. Del Valle. (vf) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Glenn A. Reiner. (vf) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Siegel & Reiner, LLP. (vf) |
| Filing 7 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Schwartz, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Richard H. Del Valle, Glenn A. Reiner, Siegel & Reiner, LLP. Document filed by J. Richard Marino. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note dated October 8, 2007, #2 Exhibit B - Note dated October 15, 2007, #3 Exhibit C - Consolidated Note dated October 15, 2007, #4 Exhibit D - Consolidated Mortgage Agreement dated October 15, 2007, #5 Exhibit E - Consent to Change Attorneys, #6 Exhibit F - Amended Summons and Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - Assignment of Mortgage, #8 Exhibit H - Judgment of Foreclosure dated June 26, 2019, #9 Errata I - Appellate Division Decision dated May 18, 2022).(Schwartz, Matthew) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Matthew Francis Schwartz to RE-FILE Document No. #2 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the civil cover sheet is not correct; 2nd page of Form not provided. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated October 1, 2020. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated October 1, 2020 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Matthew Francis Schwartz. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York; Fee Status code due (due). The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to XX Out of State; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid). (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Matthew Francis Schwartz to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Complaint. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the All Defendant radio button was selected. Re-file the pleading using the event type Complaint found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (vf) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Matthew Francis Schwartz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Richard H. Del Valle. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party role was entered incorrectly. (vf) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Richard H. Del Valle, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by J. Richard Marino..(Schwartz, Matthew) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Glenn A. Reiner, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by J. Richard Marino..(Schwartz, Matthew) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Siegel & Reiner LLP, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by J. Richard Marino..(Schwartz, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Schwartz, Matthew) Modified on 4/23/2024 (vf). |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR -COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29251288)Document filed by J. Richard Marino. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note dated October 8, 2007, #2 Exhibit B - Note dated October 15, 2007, #3 Exhibit C - Consolidated Note dated October 15, 2007, #4 Exhibit D - Consolidated Mortgage Agreement dated October 15, 2007, #5 Exhibit E - Consent to Change Attorneys, #6 Exhibit Amended Summons and Complaint, #7 Exhibit G - Assignment of Mortgage, #8 Exhibit H - Judgment of Foreclosure dated June 26, 2019, #9 Exhibit I - Appellate Division Decision dated May 18, 2022).(Schwartz, Matthew) Modified on 4/23/2024 (vf). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
