Colony Insurance Company v. United Specialty Insurance Company
| Colony Insurance Company |
| United Specialty Insurance Company |
| 1:2024cv03610 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 jd Diversity-Declaratory Judgement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 FILING ERROR - CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE ENTERED INCORRECTLY - RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent Argonaut Insurance Company, an indirect subsidiary of Brookfield Reinsurance Ltd. for Colony Insurance Company. Document filed by Colony Insurance Company..(Harwood, Jonathan) Modified on 5/10/2024 (lb). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Harwood, Jonathan) |
| Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to United Specialty Insurance Company, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Colony Insurance Company..(Harwood, Jonathan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Specialty Insurance Company. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29337942)Document filed by Colony Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit-A- Complaint, #2 Exhibit Exhibit-B- Watson Answer, #3 Exhibit Exhibit-C- Colony Policy, #4 Exhibit Exhibit-D- Target Contract, #5 Exhibit Exhibit-E- Colony Tender Letter to USIC 2.8.23, #6 Exhibit Exhibit-F- TLSS Tender Letter to USIC 2.7.24).(Harwood, Jonathan) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Notice to Attorney Jonathan Robert Harwood to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): CORPORATE PARENT/OTHER AFFILIATE ENTERED INCORRECTLY; add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. Re-file the document using the event type Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement found under the event list Other Documents - select the correct filer/filers - attach the correct signed PDF - when prompted with the message "Are there any corporate parents or other affiliates?", select the Yes or No radio button - If Yes - enter the corporate parent/other affiliate, click the Search button - select the correct corporate parent/other affiliate name from the search results list or if no person found, create a new corporate parent/other affiliate - select the party to whom the corporate parent/other affiliate should be linked - add corporate parent/other affiliate names one at a time. (lb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Colony Insurance Company v. United Specialty Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Colony Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Robert Harwood |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United Specialty Insurance Company | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
