Riley v. DNVB, Inc.
| Amanie Riley |
| DNVB, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv03834 |
| May 17, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Paul A Engelmayer |
| Robyn F Tarnofsky |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #8 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to the Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky from Deyuan Lin dated June 26, 2024. Application GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate ECF 8. SO ORDERED. DNVB, Inc. answer due 7/26/2024. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 6/28/2024) (jca)
|
| Filing 8 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Respond to the Complaint addressed to Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky from Deyuan Lin dated June 26, 2024. Document filed by DNVB, Inc...(Lin, Deyuan) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED Summons and Complaint served. DNVB, Inc. served on 6/6/2024, answer due 6/27/2024. Service was accepted by Madison King, senior Production Manager. Document filed by Amanie Riley..(Khaimov, Mars) |
|
Filing 6
ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 30 days of the service of the summons and complaint, the parties must meet and confer for at least one hour in a good-faith attempt to settle this action. In their discussions, the parties should consider whether plaintiff has satisfied the threshold requirement of standing. See, e.g., Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd., 36 F.4th 68, 77-78 (2d Cir. 2022); Harty v. W. Point Realty, Inc., 28 F.4th 435, 443-44 (2d Cir. 2022). To the extent the parties are unable to settle the case themselves, they must also discuss whether further settlement discussions through the District's Court-annexed mediation program or before the undersigned would be productive at this time. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, within 45 days of service of the summons and complaint, the parties must submit a joint letter informing the Court whether the parties have settled. If the parties do not reach a settlement, the parties shall, in their joint letter, request that the Court either (1) refer the case to mediation, or (2) set a date for a settlement conference, or (3) proceed with an initial case management conference. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky on 5/23/2024) (jca)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER REFERRING CASE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for General Pretrial (includes scheduling, discovery, non-dispositive pretrial motions, and settlement). Referred to Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky. The parties are hereby notified that this Court has written on a legal issue that appears central to this case: the applicability of the ADA to websites. See Del-Orden v. Bonobos, Inc., No. 17 Civ. 2744 (PAE), 2017 WL 6547902 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 20, 2017). (Signed by Judge Paul A. Engelmayer on 5/22/2024) (tg)
|
| Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to DNVB, Inc...(pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Paul A. Engelmayer. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to DNVB, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Amanie Riley..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Khaimov, Mars) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DNVB, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29369056)Document filed by Amanie Riley..(Khaimov, Mars) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Riley v. DNVB, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DNVB, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Deyuan Lin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Amanie Riley | |
| Represented By: | Mars Khaimov |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
