Foto Electric Supply Co., Inc. v. Marut Enterprises LLC et al
| Foto Electric Supply Co., Inc. |
| Marut Enterprises LLC and Brett Marut |
| 1:2024cv05540 |
| July 22, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jed S Rakoff |
| Patent |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 AO 120 FORM PATENT - CASE OPENING - SUBMITTED. In compliance with the provisions of 35 U.S.C. 290, the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is hereby advised that a court action has been filed on the following patent(s) in the U.S. District Court Southern District of New York. Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office electronically notified via Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF)..(jgo) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Marut Enterprises LLC..(jgo) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Brett Marut..(jgo) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Lee A. Goldberg. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code New York;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to Kings;. (jgo) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jed S. Rakoff. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(jgo) |
| Magistrate Judge Robyn F. Tarnofsky is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (jgo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (jgo) |
| Filing 6 AO 120 FORM PATENT - NOTICE OF SUBMISSION BY ATTORNEY. AO 120 Form Patent/Trademark for case opening submitted to court for review..(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 5 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Brett Marut, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by Foto Electric Supply Co., Inc...(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Marut Enterprises LLC, re: #1 Complaint,,. Document filed by Foto Electric Supply Co., Inc...(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 3 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Foto Electric Supply Co., Inc...(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Goldberg, Lee) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brett Marut, Marut Enterprises LLC. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29639176)Document filed by Foto Electric Supply Co., Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Product, #2 Exhibit 2 - U.S. Pat. No. 7,856,725, #3 Exhibit 3 - Complaint (previous action), #4 Exhibit 4 - Amendment to Final Office Action 4.3.2009, #5 Exhibit 5 - Declaration Under 37 C.F.R. Section 1.132, #6 Exhibit 6 - Excerpt from Prosecution History of '725 Patent (Dkt. 17-3)).(Goldberg, Lee) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
