Mizel v. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. et al
| mitchell mizel |
| Corey M. Horowitz and Network-1 Technologies, Inc. |
| 1:2024cv05955 |
| August 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Jesse M Furman |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 80 a-3 Investment Company Act of 1940 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 CERTIFICATE of Counsel by Laurence Paskowitz on behalf of Mitchell Mizel. Re: #15 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,. Affirmation of Service Upon Counsel for Defendants.(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, with prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) All Defendants. Document filed by Mitchell Mizel. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
| Filing 14 AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE of Summons and Complaint. Network-1 Technologies, Inc. served on 8/13/2024, answer due 10/15/2024. Service was accepted by Corporation Service Co.. Document filed by Mitchell Mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Corrected Notice of Compliance With Service of Oct. 8, 2024 Court Order. Document filed by Mitchell Mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Notice of Compliance With Service of Oct. 8, 2024 Court Order. Document filed by Mitchell Mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
Filing 11
NOTICE OF INITIAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE: Initial Conference set for 10/16/2024 at 09:00 AM before Judge Jesse M. Furman. The conference will be held remotely by telephone in accordance with Paragraph 3.B of the Court's Individual Rules and Practices in Civil Cases. The parties should join the conference by calling the Court's dedicated conference line at (888) 363-4749 and using access code 542-1540, followed by the pound (#) key. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Jesse M. Furman on 8/8/2024) (vfr)
|
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Network-1 Technologies, Inc...(pc) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Corey M. Horowitz..(pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Laurence Paskowitz. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $904,072,000; County code New York; Fee Status code due (due);. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to blank; the County code has been modified to Queens; the Fee Status code has been modified to pd (paid);. (pc) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Laurence Paskowitz. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: mitchell mizel. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted;. (pc) |
| Case Designated ECF. (pc) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Jesse M. Furman. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc) |
| Magistrate Judge Valerie Figueredo is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc) |
| Filing 8 FILING ERROR - DUPLICATE DOCKET ENTRY -REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Corey M. Horowitz, re: #6 Complaint. Document filed by mitchell mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) Modified on 8/7/2024 (pc). |
| Filing 7 FILING ERROR - DUPLICATE DOCKET ENTRY -REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Network-1 Technologies, Inc., re: #6 Complaint. Document filed by mitchell mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) Modified on 8/7/2024 (pc). |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against Corey M. Horowitz, Network-1 Technologies, Inc.. Document filed by mitchell mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) Modified on 8/7/2024 (pc). |
| Filing 5 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Corey M. Horowitz, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by mitchell mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
| Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Network-1 Technologies, Inc., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by mitchell mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) |
| Filing 2 FILING ERROR - WRONG PDF FILE ASSOCIATED WITH DOCKET ENTRY - COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29710478)Document filed by mitchell mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) Modified on 8/7/2024 (pc). |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - FILED AGAINST PARTY ERROR - COMPLAINT against All Defendants. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number BNYSDC-29710381)Document filed by mitchell mizel..(Paskowitz, Laurence) Modified on 8/7/2024 (pc). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
