Rodriguez v. Jay Global Enterprises, Inc. et al
| Walter L. Rodriguez |
| Kyung H. Jung, Jay Global Enterprises, Inc. and Gurum Corporation doing business as Jay Global Enterprises |
| 1:2024cv06278 |
| August 20, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| John P Cronan |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Jay Global Enterprises, Inc. served on 8/26/2024, answer due 9/16/2024. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky - Authorized Agent. Document filed by Walter L. Rodriguez..(Spagnolo, Victoria) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED. Gurum Corporation served on 8/26/2024, answer due 9/16/2024. Service was accepted by Sue Zouky - Authorized Agent. Document filed by Walter L. Rodriguez..(Spagnolo, Victoria) |
| Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Gurum Corporation, Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., Kyung H. Jung. (vf) |
| Filing 4 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., Gurum Corporation d/b/a Jay Global Enterprises, and Kyung H. Jung, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Walter L. Rodriguez..(Spagnolo, Victoria) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS. Notice to Attorney Victoria Spagnolo to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Request for Issuance of Summons. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the issuance of summons is not correct; defendant alias party name listed on Summons PDF does not correspond exactly to pleading caption. Re-file the document using the event type Request for Issuance of Summons found under the event list Service of Process - select the correct filer/filers - and attach the correct summons form PDF. (vf) |
| Case Designated ECF. (vf) |
| Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (vf) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge John P. Cronan. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(vf) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT - SUMMONS REQUEST PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., Gurum Corporation d/b/a Jay Global Enterprises, and Kyung H. Jung, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Walter L. Rodriguez..(Spagnolo, Victoria) Modified on 8/21/2024 (vf). |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Spagnolo, Victoria) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gurum Corporation d/b/a Jay Global Enterprises, Jay Global Enterprises, Inc., Kyung H. Jung. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29775953)Document filed by Walter L. Rodriguez..(Spagnolo, Victoria) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
