Brown v. Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc.
Zebone Brown |
Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc. |
1:2024cv06344 |
August 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Analisa Torres |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 JOINT LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from Rami M. Salim dated October 18, 2024 re: Joint Letter. Document filed by Zebone Brown. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order).(Salim, Rami) |
Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Dustin Peter Mansoor on behalf of Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc...(Mansoor, Dustin) |
Filing 8 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc. waiver sent on 9/16/2024, answer due 11/15/2024. Document filed by Zebone Brown..(Salim, Rami) |
Filing 7 ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/23/2024) (vfr) |
Filing 6 INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by October 18, 2024, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/23/2024) (vfr) |
Filing 5 ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendant shall, by October 18, 2024, file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, as further set forth herein. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by October 18, 2024, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/23/2024) (vfr) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc...(gp) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Analisa Torres. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(gp) |
Magistrate Judge Sarah L. Cave is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to JENNIFER ADAMS BRANDS, INC., re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Zebone Brown..(Salim, Rami) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Salim, Rami) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc.. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-29788576)Document filed by Zebone Brown..(Salim, Rami) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Brown v. Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Zebone Brown | |
Represented By: | Rami Salim |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Jennifer Adams Brands, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Dustin Peter Mansoor |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.