National Football League Players Association et al v. Draftkings Inc. et al
| National Football League Players Association and National Football League Players Incorporated |
| Draftkings Inc. and DK Crown Holdings Inc. |
| 1:2024cv06407 |
| August 26, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Analisa Torres |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 bc Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 LETTER addressed to Judge Analisa Torres from David L. Greenspan dated October 23, 2024 re: Diversity of citizenship. Document filed by National Football League Players Association, National Football League Players Incorporated..(Greenspan, David) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. DK Crown Holdings Inc. waiver sent on 8/27/2024, answer due 10/28/2024. Document filed by National Football League Players Association; National Football League Players Incorporated..(Greenspan, David) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED. Draftkings Inc. waiver sent on 8/27/2024, answer due 10/28/2024. Document filed by National Football League Players Association; National Football League Players Incorporated..(Greenspan, David) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Orin Snyder on behalf of DK Crown Holdings Inc., Draftkings Inc...(Snyder, Orin) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by George Eric Mastoris on behalf of National Football League Players Association, National Football League Players Incorporated..(Mastoris, George) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jeffrey L. Kessler on behalf of National Football League Players Association, National Football League Players Incorporated..(Kessler, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8
ORDER: To protect the public health, while promoting the "just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action and proceeding," Fed. R. Civ. P. 1, it is ORDERED pursuant to Rules 30(b)(3) and 30(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that all depositions in this action may be taken via telephone, videoconference, or other remote means. It is further ORDERED pursuant to Rule 30(b)(5) that a deposition will be deemed to have taken place "before an officer appointed or designated under Rule 28" if such officer attends the deposition using the same remote means used to connect all other participants, so long as all participants (including the officer) can clearly hear and be heard by all other participants. The parties are encouraged to engage in discovery through remote means at every available opportunity. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/27/2024) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER: To conserve resources, to promote judicial efficiency, and in an effort to achieve a faster disposition of this matter, it is hereby ORDERED that the parties discuss whether they are willing to consent, under 28 U.S.C. 636(c), to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge. If all parties consent to proceed before the Magistrate Judge, counsel for Defendants shall, by October 28, 2024, file a fully executed Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge form, as further set forth herein. If any party does not consent to conducting all further proceedings before the assigned Magistrate Judge, the parties must file a joint letter, by October 28, 2024, advising the Court that the parties do not consent, but without disclosing the identity of the party or parties who do not consent. The parties are free to withhold consent without negative consequences. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/27/2024) (vfr)
|
|
Filing 6
INITIAL PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Counsel for all parties are directed to submit a joint letter and a jointly proposed Case Management Plan and Scheduling Order by October 28, 2024, in accordance with Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the instructions set forth below. (As further set forth in this Order.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Analisa Torres on 8/27/2024) (vfr)
|
| Filing 5 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by National Football League Player Association..(Greenspan, David) |
| Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent National Football League Players Association, Other Affiliate 1133 20th Street Building Corporation for National Football League Players Incorporated. Document filed by National Football League Players Incorporated..(Greenspan, David) |
| Filing 3 SEALED DOCUMENT placed in vault..(jus) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(gp) (pc). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DK Crown Holdings Inc., Draftkings Inc.. (Filing Fee $ $405.00, Receipt Number 32270)Document filed by National Football League Player Association, National Football League Players Incorporated..(gp) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/26/2024: #1 Exhibit Ex A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Ex C) (pc). |
| Magistrate Judge Katharine H. Parker is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (gp) |
| Case Designated ECF. (gp) |
| SUMMONS ISSUED as to DK Crown Holdings Inc., Draftkings Inc...(gp) |
|
ORDER GRANTING PARTIAL SEALING IN CASE 1:24-MC-391..(gp)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
