Joseph v. Thomas et al
| Rhawn Joseph |
| Mary Vyskocil, Clifford Wallace, Mollie Kornreich, Eunice Lee, John P. Cronan, Brett Kavanaugh, William Orrick, Lucy Koh, Raymond Lohier, Nathanial Cousins, Neil Gorsuch, John G. Roberts, Sidney Thomas, Samuel Alito, Ferdinand Fernandez, Amy Barrett, P. Casey Pitts, Jose Cabranes, V. DeMarchi, Diarmuid O'scannlain, City Of San Jose, Mary Murguia, Robert Illman, Clarence Thomas, Merrick Garland, Alvin Bragg, NASA, Bill Nelson, Springer Nature America Inc., Springer Nature Academic and Does 1-3000 including: all judges of the 11 Federal Courts of Appeals & District of Columbia Circuit & Federal Circuit and all 94 Federal Courts & Banruptcy Courts, et al |
| 1:2024cv07850 |
| October 7, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Foley Square Office |
| Laura Taylor Swain |
| Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 6, 7. Mailed to: Rhawn Joseph 677 Elm St. San Jose, CA 95126. |
Filing 7
CIVIL JUDGMENT: For the reasons stated in the November 22, 2024, order, this action is dismissed. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Courts judgment would not be taken in good faith and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/26/2024) (Attachments: #1 Appeal Package) (km)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. See 28 U.S.C. 1914, 1915. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter judgment in this case. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 11/22/2024) (tro) Transmission to Orders and Judgments Clerk for processing.
|
| Filing 5 LETTER dated 10/7/24 re: PLAINTIFF'S LETTER TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT CASE WAS MIS-FILED. NO RECEIPT FOR PAYMENT FRAUD, FRAUD AGAINST THE COURT. Document filed by Rhawn Joseph. (jbo) |
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 4. Mailed to: Rhawn Joseph 677 Elm St. San Jose, CA 95126. |
|
Filing 4
ORDER DIRECTING PAYMENT OF FEE OR IFP APPLICATION: Plaintiff is directed to render payment of the $405.00 in filing fees or submit an IFP application to this Court's Pro Se Office within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to assign this matter to my docket. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). Filing Fee due by 11/18/2024. In Forma Pauperis (IFP) Application due by 11/18/2024. (Signed by Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 10/17/2024) (Attachments: #1 IFP Application) (keb)
|
| MAILING RECEIPT: Document No: 3. Mailed to: Rhawn Joseph 677 Elm St. San Jose, CA 95126. |
| NOTICE OF CASE REASSIGNMENT - SUA SPONTE to Judge Laura Taylor Swain. Judge Unassigned is no longer assigned to the case. (vba) |
|
Filing 3
STANDING ORDER IN RE CASES FILED BY PRO SE PLAINTIFFS (See 24-MISC-127 Standing Order filed March 18, 2024). To ensure that all cases heard in the Southern District of New York are handled promptly and efficiently, all parties must keep the court apprised of any new contact information. It is a party's obligation to provide an address for service; service of court orders cannot be accomplished if a party does not update the court when a change of address occurs. Accordingly, all self-represented litigants are hereby ORDERED to inform the court of each change in their address or electronic contact information. Parties may #consent to electronic service to receive notifications of court filings by email, rather than relying on regular mail delivery. Parties may also ask the court for #permission to file documents electronically. Forms, including instructions for consenting to electronic service and requesting permission to file documents electronically, may be found by clicking on the hyperlinks in this order, or by accessing the forms on the courts website, nysd.uscourts.gov/forms. The procedures that follow apply only to cases filed by pro se plaintiffs. If the court receives notice from the United States Postal Service that an order has been returned to the court, or otherwise receives information that the address of record for a self-represented plaintiff is no longer valid, the court may issue an Order to Show Cause why the case should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with this order. Such order will be sent to the plaintiffs last known address and will also be viewable on the court's electronic docket. A notice directing the parties' attention to this order shall be docketed (and mailed to any self-represented party that has appeared and has not consented to electronic service) upon the opening of each case or miscellaneous matter that is classified as pro se in the court's records. (Signed by Chief Judge Laura Taylor Swain on 3/18/2024) (job)
|
| CASE MANAGEMENT NOTE: For each electronic filing made in a case involving a self-represented party who has not consented to electronic service, the filing party must serve the document on such self-represented party in a manner permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2) (other than through the ECF system) and file proof of service for each document so served. Please see #Rule 9.2 of the courts ECF Rules & Instructions for further information..(job) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(job) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Samuel Alito, Amy Barrett, Alvin Bragg, Jose Cabranes, City Of San Jose, Nathanial Cousins, John P. Cronan, V. DeMarchi, Does 1-3000 including: all judges of the 11 Federal Courts of Appeals & District of Columbia Circuit & Federal Circuit and all 94 Federal Courts & Banruptcy Courts, et al, Ferdinand Fernandez, Merrick Garland, Neil Gorsuch, Robert Illman, Brett Kavanaugh, Lucy Koh, Mollie Kornreich, Eunice Lee, Raymond Lohier, Mary Murguia, NASA, Bill Nelson, Diarmuid O'scannlain, William Orrick, P. Casey Pitts, John G. Roberts, Springer Nature Academic, Springer Nature America Inc., Clarence Thomas, Sidney Thomas, Mary Vyskocil, Clifford Wallace. Document filed by Rhawn Joseph..(job) |
| Case Designated ECF. (job) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
