Building Service 32BJ Health Fund et al v. Emerald Green Building Services, LLC
Building Service 32BJ Health Fund, Building Service 32BJ Legal Services Fund, Massachusetts Service Employees Pension Fund and Building Service 32BJ Thomas Shortman Training Scholarship and Safety Fund |
Emerald Green Building Services, LLC |
1:2024cv07858 |
October 16, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1145 E.R.I.S.A.: Delinquent Contributions |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Emerald Green Building Services, LLC, re: #1 Complaint,. Document filed by Building Service 32BJ Health Fund, Building Service 32BJ Legal Services Fund, Building Service 32BJ Thomas Shortman Training Scholarship and Safety Fund, Massachusetts Service Employees Pension Fund..(Sturm, Ira) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix Names of Plaintiffs).(Sturm, Ira) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Emerald Green Building Services, LLC. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-30049605)Document filed by Massachusetts Service Employees Pension Fund, Building Service 32BJ Health Fund, Building Service 32BJ Thomas Shortman Training Scholarship and Safety Fund, Building Service 32BJ Legal Services Fund..(Sturm, Ira) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.