Ikigai Marketing Works LLC v. Brofsky
Ikigai Marketing Works LLC |
Louis Brofsky |
1:2024cv07864 |
October 16, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Arun Subramanian |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity Action |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Louis Brofsky. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Ismail Amin. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Ikigai Marketing Works LLC. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party text was omitted. (sj) |
***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Ismail Amin. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Dollar Demand $527,000,000; County code Albany. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Dollar Demand has been modified to $527,000; the County code has been modified to XX Out of State. (sj) |
CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Arun Subramanian. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(sj) |
Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron is designated to handle matters that may be referred in this case. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (sj) |
Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
Filing 4 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Ikigai Marketing Works LLC..(Amin, Ismail) |
Filing 3 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Amin, Ismail) |
Filing 2 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Louis Brofsky, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Ikigai Marketing Works LLC..(Amin, Ismail) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Louis Brofsky. (Filing Fee $ 405.00, Receipt Number ANYSDC-30050339)Document filed by Ikigai Marketing Works LLC..(Amin, Ismail) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Ikigai Marketing Works LLC v. Brofsky | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Louis Brofsky | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Ikigai Marketing Works LLC | |
Represented By: | Ismail Amin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.