Sherwood v. Saul
Plaintiff: Brian Sherwood Jr and Brian Sherwood
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 7:2021cv10847
Filed: December 17, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Paul E Davison
Referring Judge: Kenneth M Karas
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 3, 2022 Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED as to Andrew Saul..(gp)
February 3, 2022 Filing 10 REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Andrew Saul, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Brian Sherwood..(Goldstein, Scott)
December 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE. Order that case be referred to the Clerk of Court for assignment to a Magistrate Judge for Social Security. Referred to Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/27/2021) (kv)
December 22, 2021 Filing 8 MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #6 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Brian Sherwood. ENDORSEMENT: Application is granted. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/22/2021) (ate) Transmission to Civil Case Openings Clerk for processing.
December 22, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 STANDING ORDER IN RE MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS IN SOCIAL SECURITY CASES (See 16-MISC-171 Standing Order filed April 28, 2016). ORDERED that in all Social Security cases hereafter filed under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) and 42 U.S.C. 1383(c)(3), the defendant shall within 90 days after service file the certified transcript of administrative proceedings, which shall constitute the defendants' answer, or otherwise move against the complaint... that unless otherwise ordered by the judge to whom the case is assigned, in cases where the plaintiff is represented by counsel, the plaintiff shall file a motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the defendant files the certified transcript of the administrative proceedings... that in cases where the plaintiff is appearing pro se, the defendant shall file its motion for judgment on the pleadings within 60 days of the date on which the certified transcript of administrative proceedings have been filed... (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 4/20/2016) (pc)
December 22, 2021 CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/district-judges. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/rules/ecf-related-instructions..(pc)
December 22, 2021 Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1) parties are notified that they may consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. Parties who wish to consent may access the necessary form at the following link: #https://nysd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/2018-06/AO-3.pdf. (pc)
December 22, 2021 Case Designated ECF. (pc)
December 21, 2021 Filing 6 REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Brian Sherwood..(Goldstein, Scott)
December 21, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Scott R Goldstein to RE-FILE Document No. #5 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; Caption title for the request to proceed in Forma pauperis does not match the complaint caption title ( Brian Sherwood ). If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 12/27/2021. (pc)
December 20, 2021 Filing 5 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Brian Sherwood..(Goldstein, Scott) Modified on 12/21/2021 (pc).
December 20, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING PARTY MODIFICATION. Notice to attorney Scott R Goldstein. The party information for the following party/parties has been modified: Brian Sherwood Jr, Andrew Saul. The information for the party/parties has been modified for the following reason/reasons: party name contained a typographical error; party role was entered incorrectly; party text was omitted;. (pc)
December 20, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CIVIL. CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Scott R Goldstein. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: Office code White Plains Suspense;. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the Office code has been modified to White Plains;. (pc)
December 20, 2021 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Scott R Goldstein to RE-FILE Document No. #4 Request to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the PDF attached to the docket entry for the pleading is not correct; Caption title for the request to proceed in Forma pauperis does not match the complaint caption title. If the deficiency/deficiencies are not corrected within five (5) days per Amended Standing Order 15-mc-00131 this case will be administratively closed. Initial Pleading due by 12/27/2021. (pc)
December 17, 2021 Filing 4 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING - PDF ERROR - REQUEST TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS. Document filed by Brian Sherwood Jr..(Goldstein, Scott) Modified on 12/20/2021 (pc).
December 17, 2021 Filing 3 FILING ERROR - PDF ERROR - REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS as to Andrew Saul, re: #1 Complaint. Document filed by Brian Sherwood Jr..(Goldstein, Scott) Modified on 2/3/2022 (gp).
December 17, 2021 Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed..(Goldstein, Scott)
December 17, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul. Document filed by Brian Sherwood Jr..(Goldstein, Scott)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sherwood v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Sherwood Jr
Represented By: Scott R Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Sherwood
Represented By: Scott R Goldstein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?