Quiller v. The City of Yonkers et al
7:2006cv06846 |
September 6, 2006 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Charles L. Brieant |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER:...Accordingly, plaintiffs maliciousprosecution claims against defendants Vellozzi, Hurley, Olcese and Doheny aredismissed. However, as to the substance of plaintiffs malicious prosecution claims against defendant Donald son and the City of Yonkers, there are genuine factual issues which may reasonably be resolved in favor of either party. Accordingly, summary judgment must be denied as to plaintiffs malicious prosecution claims against Officer Donaldson and the City of Yonkers..V. REMAINING CLAIMS As to the remaining claims, a review of the entire record indicates numerous triable factual issues including, but not limited to, whether there was probable cause to prosecute plaintiff for burglary and whether plain tiff was subjected to excessive force in the course of his arrest. Accordingly, defendants motion is denied in all other respects.IX. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, defendants motion for summary judgment is GRANTED IN PART and the following claims are dismissed: (1) all claims against the Yonkers Police Department; (2) all false arrest claims; and (3) the malicious prosecution claims against defendants Vellozzi, Hurley, Olcese and Doheny. Thus, summary judgment is denied as to the foll owing claims: (1) the malicious prosecution claims against Officer Donaldson and the City of Yonkers; (2) the excessive force claims; (3)judgment is denied as to the following claims: (I) the malicious prosecution claims against Officer Donaldson and the City of Yonkers; (2) the excessive force claims; (3)claims for assault and battery; (4) the Monell claims against the City of Yonkers; and (5) the claim against Commissioner Taggart, sued only in his official capacity. The Court shall conduct a telephone conference on Monday, January 25,2010, at 9:00 a.m. Plaintiff shall initiate the call.The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending motion(Docket # 1 6-1 7). SO ORDERED (Signed by Magistrate Judge George A. Yanthis on 1/5/2010) (rj) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Quiller v. The City of Yonkers et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.