The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Lisowski

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Lisowski

The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Lisowski

Plaintiff:	The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Defendant:	Marie Lisowski
Case Number:	7:2007cv06619
Filed:	July 23, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Dutchess
Presiding Judge:	Lisa Margaret Smith
Presiding Judge:	Unassigned
Nature of Suit:	Insurance
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 7, 2009	Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS:...Accordingly, Joetta Lisowski's motion for summary Judgement in the amount of 150,00 is granted, ans her default judgment motion is denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion (Dkt. No. 44), enter judgment for Joetta Lisowski, and to close this case. for 52 Report and Recommendations,,,,, SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/2/2009) The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies.(rj)
June 26, 2009	Filing 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION:... For the aforementioned reasons I conclude, and respectfully recommend that Your Honor should conclude, that there exist no genuine issues of material fact and that the Court should extend collateral estoppel effect to th e decision of the Dutchess County Family Court declaring Matthew Lisowski emancipated as of July 17, 2006. Accordingly, I conclude, and respectfully recommend that Your Honor should conclude, that the emancipation order disqualifies Matthew Lisowski from receiving the $150,000 in life insurance proceeds designated for his benefit in the terms of the stipulation of agreement and settlement entered into by Marie and Joseph Lisowskiupon their divorce in December, 1995, and that judgment in fav or of Joetta Lisowski in theamount of the $150,000, which represents the balance of the life insurance proceeds, should be entered. I respectfully recommend that this award terminates both the claim asserted against Northwestern by Marie Lisowsk i for an award of the proceeds and the cross claim assertedagainst Joetta Lisowski by Marie Lisowski for an award of the life insurance proceeds, and it moots the default judgment motion filed by Joetta Lisowski. I respectfully recommend that theClerk of the Court should be directed to mark the file as closed. Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2009 SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 06/26/2009) The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies.(gco)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 7, 2009

Filing 55 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS:...Accordingly, Joetta Lisowski's motion for summary Judgement in the amount of 150,00 is granted, ans her default judgment motion is denied as moot. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion (Dkt. No. 44), enter judgment for Joetta Lisowski, and to close this case. for 52 Report and Recommendations,,,,, SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/2/2009) The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies.(rj)

June 26, 2009

Filing 52 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION:... For the aforementioned reasons I conclude, and respectfully recommend that Your Honor should conclude, that there exist no genuine issues of material fact and that the Court should extend collateral estoppel effect to th e decision of the Dutchess County Family Court declaring Matthew Lisowski emancipated as of July 17, 2006. Accordingly, I conclude, and respectfully recommend that Your Honor should conclude, that the emancipation order disqualifies Matthew Lisowski from receiving the $150,000 in life insurance proceeds designated for his benefit in the terms of the stipulation of agreement and settlement entered into by Marie and Joseph Lisowskiupon their divorce in December, 1995, and that judgment in fav or of Joetta Lisowski in theamount of the $150,000, which represents the balance of the life insurance proceeds, should be entered. I respectfully recommend that this award terminates both the claim asserted against Northwestern by Marie Lisowsk i for an award of the proceeds and the cross claim assertedagainst Joetta Lisowski by Marie Lisowski for an award of the life insurance proceeds, and it moots the default judgment motion filed by Joetta Lisowski. I respectfully recommend that theClerk of the Court should be directed to mark the file as closed. Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2009 SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 06/26/2009) The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies.(gco)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Lisowski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company
Represented By:	Norman Louis Tolle
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Marie Lisowski
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?