Tinsley v. R,K. Woods

Tinsley v. R,K. Woods

Plaintiff:	Jason Tinsley
Defendant:	R,K. Woods
Case Number:	7:2008cv01332
Filed:	February 11, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Franklin
Presiding Judge:	Mark D. Fox
Presiding Judge:	Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 28, 2011	Filing 27 MEMORANDUM DECISION: Upon the appropriate review of the record, the Court finds Magistrate Judge Davison's Report and Recommendation to be a clear and proper statement and application of the law. The Court therefore adopts the R&R as its decision, and the petition is denied and dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/28/2011) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (lnl)
July 27, 2011	Filing 23 MEMORANDUM DECISION for 22 Report and Recommendations. Judge Davisons Report and Recommendation was filed on June 16, 2011. To date, noobjection has been received from any party to this action. Reviewing the Report and Recommendation, the Court se es no clear error in Judge Davison's findings of fact or his legal conclusions. More so, the Court believes the Report and Recommendation is correct as a matter of law. Accordingly, it is adopted as the decision of the Court. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. #1) is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 7/26/2011) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (rj)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 28, 2011

Filing 27 MEMORANDUM DECISION: Upon the appropriate review of the record, the Court finds Magistrate Judge Davison's Report and Recommendation to be a clear and proper statement and application of the law. The Court therefore adopts the R&R as its decision, and the petition is denied and dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is instructed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/28/2011) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (lnl)

July 27, 2011

Filing 23 MEMORANDUM DECISION for 22 Report and Recommendations. Judge Davisons Report and Recommendation was filed on June 16, 2011. To date, noobjection has been received from any party to this action. Reviewing the Report and Recommendation, the Court se es no clear error in Judge Davison's findings of fact or his legal conclusions. More so, the Court believes the Report and Recommendation is correct as a matter of law. Accordingly, it is adopted as the decision of the Court. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. #1) is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to close this case. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 7/26/2011) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (rj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tinsley v. R,K. Woods
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jason Tinsley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: R,K. Woods
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?