De Masi v. Schumer

De Masi v. Schumer

Plaintiff:	Douglas D. De Masi, Sr.
Defendant:	Charles E. Schumer
Case Number:	7:2008cv04818
Filed:	May 23, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Dutchess
Presiding Judge:	Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 31, 2009	Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER: III. Conclusion, for the reasons stated in this Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED, and the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion on the docket (Dkt. No. 2); it is further ORDERED that the United States is substituted as Defendant and Senator Charles E. Schumer is dismissed as Defendant; it is further ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice, and the Clerk of t he Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion on the docket (Dkt. No. 10) and close the case. re: 2 MOTION to Remand. filed by Douglas D. De Masi, Sr., 10 MOTION to Substitute Party. Old Party: New Party:. MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Charles E. Schumer., Motions terminated: 10 MOTION to Substitute Party. Old Party: New Party:. MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Charles E. Schumer, 2 MOTION to Remand. filed by Douglas D. De Masi, Sr.., United States of America added. Charles E. Schumer terminated. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 03/31/2009) "The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies".(gco)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 31, 2009

Filing 14 OPINION AND ORDER: III. Conclusion, for the reasons stated in this Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Remand is DENIED, and the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion on the docket (Dkt. No. 2); it is further ORDERED that the United States is substituted as Defendant and Senator Charles E. Schumer is dismissed as Defendant; it is further ORDERED that Defendant's motion to dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice, and the Clerk of t he Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motion on the docket (Dkt. No. 10) and close the case. re: 2 MOTION to Remand. filed by Douglas D. De Masi, Sr., 10 MOTION to Substitute Party. Old Party: New Party:. MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Charles E. Schumer., Motions terminated: 10 MOTION to Substitute Party. Old Party: New Party:. MOTION to Dismiss. filed by Charles E. Schumer, 2 MOTION to Remand. filed by Douglas D. De Masi, Sr.., United States of America added. Charles E. Schumer terminated. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 03/31/2009) "The Clerk's Office Has Mailed Copies".(gco)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: De Masi v. Schumer
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas D. De Masi, Sr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Charles E. Schumer
Represented By:	Lawrence Heath Fogelman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?