Landon v. County of Orange et al
| Eric Landon |
| County of Orange, The Orange County Department of Probation, Victoria Casey, Ann E. Putnam, Vincent Morgiewicz and Kroll Laboratory Specialists, Inc., |
| 7:2008cv08048 |
| September 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| Civil Rights: Other Office |
| Orange |
| Cathy Seibel |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER granting 7 Motion to Dismiss; granting 15 Motion to Dismiss.... For the foregoing reasons, the County Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED without prejudice, except as to the Probation Department, the Motion of wh ich is granted with prejudice. Defendant Krolls Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions (Docs. 7, 15) and enter judgment for Defendant Kroll. If a second amended compla int is not filed by August 13, 2009, the Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to enter judgment for the remaining Defendants. If a second amended complaint is filed by August 13, 2009, Plaintiff and the County Defendants are directed to appear at a case management conference on September 11, 2009 at 9:15 am. So Ordered.. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 7/23/09) (fk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
