Mehl v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Norbert Mehl
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation, Capital One Financial Corporation, et. al., Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. and Capital One, N.A., inclusive
Case Number: 7:2009cv01783
Filed: February 25, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Contract: Other Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 28:1331 Fed. Question

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 130 OPINION AND ORDER [REDACTED]: For the reasons explained, Defendants' motion for summary judgment is granted on the copyright claim, and Plaintiff's cross- motion for summary judgment on that claim is denied. Both Parties' summary judgm ent motions are denied as to the contract claim, though, as mentioned, Defendant Capital One Financial Corporation has been dismissed from the case with prejudice to preserve diversity jurisdiction. Finally, Plaintiff's motion for sanctions and preclusion of evidence is also denied. The Clerk is directed to terminate the pending motions, (Dkt. Nos. 87, 99).re: 87 CROSS MOTION for Summary Judgment and Application for Rule 16 and 37 Sanctions served on July 27, 2012. filed by Banxcor p, 99 MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment. filed by Costco Wholesale Corporation, Capital One, N.A., inclusive, Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., Capital One Financial Corporation (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 10/17/2013) (rj)
July 14, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 34 OPINION & ORDER:...For the reasons stated herein, Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the relevant motion (Dkt.No.20). SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 7/13/2010) (rj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mehl v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Norbert Mehl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Costco Wholesale Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One Financial Corporation, et. al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Capital One, N.A., inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?