Bank of America, N.A. v. RJ Dooley Realty, Inc.

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Bank of America, N.A. v. RJ Dooley Realty, Inc.

Bank of America, N.A. v. RJ Dooley Realty, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Bank of America, N.A.
Defendant:	RJ Dooley Realty, Inc.
Case Number:	7:2009cv04981
Filed:	May 28, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Dutchess
Presiding Judge:	Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 18, 2013	Filing 60 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. The motion to dismiss the action based upon plaintiffs failure to prosecute is GRANTED. The Clerk is requested to enterjudgment accordingly and close this case.for 57 Report and Recommendations, (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 1/17/2013) (rj)
July 26, 2011	Filing 23 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. #18) seeking the following relief:1. Substitution of Preferred Group of Manhattan, Inc. as plaintiff in this action pursuant to Rule 25(c); 2. Severance and dismissal of all claims against RJ Dooley Realty, I nc., Mahoneys at Dooley Square Inc., New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, and John Does 1-100 without prejudice pursuant to Rule 21; 3. Leave to amend the complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2).There has been no opposition to the motion, and the motion is granted. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 7/25/2011) (fk)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 18, 2013

Filing 60 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Accordingly, the Court adopts the R&R in its entirety. The motion to dismiss the action based upon plaintiffs failure to prosecute is GRANTED. The Clerk is requested to enterjudgment accordingly and close this case.for 57 Report and Recommendations, (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 1/17/2013) (rj)

July 26, 2011

Filing 23 ORDER: Plaintiff has filed a motion (Doc. #18) seeking the following relief:1. Substitution of Preferred Group of Manhattan, Inc. as plaintiff in this action pursuant to Rule 25(c); 2. Severance and dismissal of all claims against RJ Dooley Realty, I nc., Mahoneys at Dooley Square Inc., New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, and John Does 1-100 without prejudice pursuant to Rule 21; 3. Leave to amend the complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a)(2).There has been no opposition to the motion, and the motion is granted. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 7/25/2011) (fk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bank of America, N.A. v. RJ Dooley Realty, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Bank of America, N.A.
Represented By:	Kenneth Steven Yudell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: RJ Dooley Realty, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?