McGee v. Dunn et al
| James P McGee |
| James Dunn, J. Dunn Construction Corp., Ector Perez Galindo, Town of Carmel, Town of Carmel Police Department, Christopher Fox, John Doe, Robert Bagnarol, Brian Karst, John (Jack) Harney, Michael Cazzari, Michael R Johnson, Putnam County District Attorney's Office, Kevin Wright, Esq. and Robert A Noah, Esq. |
| 7:2009cv06098 |
| July 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Dutchess |
| Stephen C. Robinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: re: 147 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment Notice of Motion. filed by John (Jack) Harney, Brian Karst, Christopher Fox, Michael R Johnson, Robert Ba gnarol, Michael Cazzari, 143 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by James Dunn. For the reasons set forth above, defendant James Dunn's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 143) is GRANTED. Further, defendants Robert Bagnarol, M ichael Cazzari, Christopher Fox, John (Jack) Harney, Michael R. Johnson, and Brian Karst's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 147) is GRANTED. Accordingly, the pretrial conference and trial in this civil action are VACATED. It is further ORDE RED that this civil action be DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the active docket of this Court. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to counsel of record herein. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. (Signed by Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 12/16/2015) (rj)
|
|
Filing
122
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING THE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DISMISSING THE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AS MOOT: For the reasons above, the plaintiff's motion for leave to file a second amended complaint (ECF No. 111) is GRANTED. Further, the plaintiff's first amended complaint is DISMISSED AS MOOT. All deadlines provided in this Court's most recent scheduling order (ECF No. 103)shall remain in effect. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to counsel of record herein. Furthermore, the Clerk is DIRECTED to file the second amended complaint. (Signed by Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 12/30/2014) (lnl)
|
|
Filing
83
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER LIFTING THE STAY AND GRANTING DEFENDANT JAMES DUNN'S MOTION TO DISMISS: For the reasons stated above, the defendant James Dunn's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. The Clerk is DIRECTED to transmit a copy of this memorandum opinion and order to counsel of record herein. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment on this matter. The Clerk is further DIRECTED pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, to enter judgment on this Court's previous decision and order granting certain defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF No. 50). (Signed by Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/29/2013) (mml)
|
|
Filing
80
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR REARGUMENT, RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT: the plaintiff's motion for reargument, relief from judgment or, in the alternative, leave to amend the complaint (ECF No. 61) is hereby DENIED. (Signed by Judge Frederick P. Stamp, Jr on 4/16/2013) (lnl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
