Nesmith v. Mount Vernon City School District et al
Plaintiff: Wayne N. Nesmith
Defendant: Mount Vernon City School District, Gail Schwarting, John Does and Dahlia A. Jackson
Case Number: 7:2009cv09949
Filed: December 3, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: Bronx
Presiding Judge: Paul E. Davison
Presiding Judge: Stephen C. Robinson
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER adopting 56 Report and Recommendations denying; 67 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Wayne N. Nesmith, denying; 37 Motion for Recusal filed by Wayne N. Nesmith, granting; 49 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Mount Vernon City School Di strict, granting; 16 Motion to Dismiss filed by New York State Workers' Compensation Board, granting; 43 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mount Vernon City School District, granting; 15 Motion to Dismiss, filed by New York State Workers' Co mpensation Board. This Court hereby concludes as follows: Defendants' motion to dismiss is hereby GRANTED and Plaintiff's Title VII claim, Eighth Amendment claim, First Amendment claim, and Fourteenth Amendment Due Process claim are therefo re hereby DISMISSED. Plaintiff's Fourteenth Amendment equal protection claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff's motion for attorney's fees is hereby DENIED. This Court concurs with the Report and Recommendation's denial of numerous pro se motions. Plaintiff's "Motion Demand Trial by Judge Upon the Magistrate Judge's Sua Sponte Recusal from Entering Judgment on Pleadings & Rule 11 Sanction" [dkt. no 37] is hereby DENIED. Plaintiff's "Motion to Invoke Title VII" [dkt no. 67] is hereby DENIED. (Signed by Judge Richard Owen on 6/26/2013) (tro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nesmith v. Mount Vernon City School District et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wayne N. Nesmith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mount Vernon City School District
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gail Schwarting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Dahlia A. Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?