Knox et al v. County of Putnam et al
| Raymond C. Knox and Katherine C. Barramen |
| County of Putnam, Putnam County Sheriff's Department, Timothy R. Gannon, Catherine Brumley, Andrew D. Clavy, Patrict J. O' Connell, Ronald Schiavone and Cathy Bookless |
| 7:2010cv01671 |
| March 2, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Westchester |
| Cathy Seibel |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 43 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment isGRANTED as to Plaintiffs Fomteenth Amendment and conspiracy claims, and DENIED as to Plaintiffs state and federal malicious prosecution claims and Banamen's derivative claim based on Plaintiffs malicious prosecution claims. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate this motion. Doc. 43.Additionally, Plaint iff is directed to show cause in writing by October 5, 2012, why his claims against Bookless should not be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Plaintiffs submission to this Court should include accurate and up-to-date information about Bookless' bankruptcy proceeding.The parties are directed to appear for a conference on October 30, 2012 at 11:30 am. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 9/27/2012) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (fk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
