Kohlhausen v. Suny Rockland Community College et al
| Kimberly Ann Kohlhausen |
| Suny Rockland Community College Federation of Teachers Union, Local 871,, Suny Rockland Community College, The County Of Rockland, The Board of Trustees of Suny Rockland Community College, Ian Blake Newham, Clifford L. Garner, Clifford L. Wood and Martha Rottman |
| 7:2010cv03168 |
| April 14, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Rockland |
| Stephen C. Robinson |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
OPINION AND ORDER: Motions terminated:The Court thus GRANTS the Union Defendants' motion for summary judgment on Kohlhausen's Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection claim, as to the Union and Garner as Union President. 71 MOTION for Summa ry Judgment of Defendants Clifford L. Garner and SUNY Rockland Community College Federation of Teachers Union, Local 1871. filed by Clifford L. Garner, Suny Rockland Community College Federation of Teachers Union, Local 871. (Signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/12/2011) (rj)
|
|
Filing
69
OPINION AND ORDER re: 65 FIRST MOTION Relief From Order filed by Clifford L. Garner, Suny Rockland Community College Federation of Teachers Union, Local 871. Accordingly, the Court DENIES the Union Defendants motion for relief from the February 9, 2011 Opinion and Order. (Signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/5/2011) (fk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
