Hoefer v. Board of Education of the Enlarged City School District of Middletown et al
| Francis E Hoefer |
| Board of Education of the Enlarged City School District of Middletown, Kenneth Eastwood, William Geiger, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 |
| 7:2010cv03244 |
| April 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Oswego |
| Kenneth M. Karas |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
74
OPINION AND ORDER re: 57 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Kenneth Eastwood: Plaintiff Francis E. Hoefer ("Hoefer") commenced this action on April 16, 2010 against the Board of Education of the Enlarged City School Distri ct of Middletown (the "Middletown Board"), Dr. Kenneth Eastwood ("Eastwood"), William Geiger ("Geiger") (together the "Defendants"), claiming violations of the First and Fourth Amendments. Doc. 1 ("Compl."). Before this Court is Eastwood's motion for summary judgment to dismiss Hoefer's First Amendment claim. For the reasons set forth above, Eastwood's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion, Doc. 57. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 6/6/2017) (jwh)
|
|
Filing
47
OPINION AND ORDER: The Court assumes the parties' familiarity with the underlying facts and procedural history of this case. On April 22, 2013, counsel informed the Court that all claims in this matter had been settled. Accordingly, on April 23, 2013, the Court entered an order providing that this action was "discontinued, without costs to either party, subject to reopening should the settlement not be consummated within sixty (60) days of the date hereof." Doc. 27.... Sixty days of silence passed. It was not until September 2013-more than four months after entry of the sixty-day order-that the Court received its first indication from the parties that efforts to consummate the settlement might not have been entirely s uccessful. Before the Court are letters from Plaintiff and Defendant Dr. Eastwood addressing the issue of whether the Court has jurisdiction to hear the case. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff's application to reinstate the case is DENIED and the case is hereby dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close the case. It is SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 5/28/2014) (ja)
|
|
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER re: 39 MOTION for Leave to File Summary Judgment Motion, filed by Kenneth Eastwood. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion for Permission to File a Dispositive Motion is hereby DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is r espectfully directed to terminate this motion, Doc. 39. The parties are directed to appear for a pre-trial conference on April 22, 2014 at 11:30 a.m. in Courtroom 619, at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. It is SO ORDERED. (Pretrial Conference set for 4/22/2014 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 619, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 4/4/2014) (ja)
|
|
Filing
21
OPINION AND ORDER re: 11 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by William Geiger, Board of Education of the Enlarged City School District of Middletown, Kenneth Eastwood. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants' Motion for Partial Sum mary Judgment on Plaintiff's false arrest claim against Eastwood is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's claims against John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 are DISMISSED. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate this motion, Doc. 11, and to t erminate John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 as defendants in this case. The parties are to appear for a pre-trial conference on January 29, 2013 at 11:00 am. It is SO ORDERED. (Pretrial Conference set for 1/29/2013 at 11:00 AM before Judge Edgardo Ramos.) (Signed by Judge Edgardo Ramos on 1/9/2013) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
