Girau et al v. The SPX Corporation et al
Plaintiff: |
Louis Girau and Rosemary Girau |
Defendant: |
The Eaton Corporation, The CT Corporation and The Baldwin Supply Corp. |
Case Number: |
7:2010cv04320 |
Filed: |
June 1, 2010 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Office: |
White Plains Office |
County: |
XX Out of State |
Presiding Judge: |
J. Frederick Motz |
Nature of Suit: |
Personal Injury- Product Liability |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
September 14, 2017 |
Filing
214
OPINION AND ORDER re: 196 CROSS MOTION to Preclude Defendant Europower from asserting the belated Affirmative Defense that its parent corporation Europower Group, Ltd. manufactured the defective hydraulic hose. filed by Louis Girau, [1 83] MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Europower, Inc., 206 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by CRP Industries, Inc., 202 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by A&M Industrial, 177 CROSS MOTION to Preclude Defendant Europower from asserting the belated Affirmative Defense that its parent corporation Europower Group, Ltd. manufactured the defective hydraulic hose. filed by Louis Girau. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiffs' cross-motion to preclude Defendant from asserting certain defenses is DENIED. The pending motions for summary judgment filed by Third-Party Defendants (ECF Nos. 202 & 206) are DENIED as MOOT. Similarly, because the unde rlying action is now dismissed, the Second Third-Party complaint is also dismissed, without prejudice, as MOOT. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motions at ECF Nos. 177, 183 & 196 and Nos. 202 & 206, to enter judgment in favor of Defendant, and to close the case. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 9/14/17) (yv)
|
August 20, 2014 |
Filing
106
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: re: 102 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Consolidated Edison, Inc. Accordingly, Con Ed's motion for summary judgement is GRANTED. To the extent there may be any cross-claims still pending against Con Ed, those are also dismissed. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate this motion (Doc. 102) and dismiss the case as against Third-Party Defendants Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., and Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 8/20/2014) (rj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?