Rickett v. Orsino et al
Keith Allen Rickett |
Colinel Orsino, Earle Smith, Jr., Marie Kirms, Nona Cox, Duboise, Bennett, Dicharo, Rusneck and Sherri Neigher |
7:2010cv05152 |
July 6, 2010 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Franklin |
Cathy Seibel |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 138 ORDER: A conference was held in the captioned case today, May 3, 2013. Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, did not appear, nor did he contact the Court in advance to request an adjournment. At the conference, I set the following schedule for pretrial act ivity: the Joint Pretrial Order is due by July 3, 2013; any contemplated motions in limine are due on July 12, 2013, with responses thereto due by July 19, 2013; proposed voir dire questions and proposed jury instructions are due by July 19, 2013; an d the case is on 48-hours notice for trial as of July 22, 2013 (meaning that I can set a trial date for as early as July 24, 2013 giving the parties at least 48-hours notice). At the conference, I also advised that if both parties consent to trial be fore a Magistrate Judge, a Magistrate Judge will be able to give the parties a firm trial date. Plaintiff is ordered to provide the Court, in writing, by the close of business on May 10, 2013, with the following information: * An explanation as to wh y Plaintiff did not attend the conference at its scheduled time; * Whether or not Plaintiff has been able to retain counsel in this case; * If Plaintiff has not been able to retain counsel in this case, whether he wants the Court to attempt to find h im pro bono counsel; and * A phone number and email address where Plaintiff can be reached. Plaintiff's response can be sent to the Court by hand delivery to the Clerk's Office, by U.S. mail, or by facsimile (914-390-4278). In the event tha t Plaintiff cannot provide the required information by these means within the set time period, Plaintiff may contact Chambers by telephone (914-390-4271) to arrange for email delivery. SO ORDERED. (Joint Pretrial Order due by 7/3/2013. Motions in Limine due by 7/12/2013. Responses due by 7/19/2013.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 5/3/2013) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (lnl) |
Filing 132 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: I adopt the thorough and carefully reasoned R&R as the decision of the Court. Summary judgment is granted as to all claims except for the Eighth Amendment claim against Smith arising out of the alleged physic al assaults, and the First Amendment retaliation claims against Smith relating to interference with Plaintiff's mail and interference with his attempt to file a grievance. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending moti ons (Docs. 76, 87). The parties are to participate in a status conference on May 3, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 3/21/2013) The Clerks Office Has Mailed Copies. (Status Conf. date of 5/3/2013 verbally confirmed with Chambers on 3/21/2013. (lnl) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.