Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
Plaintiff: Saliha Madden
Defendant: Midland Funding, LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Case Number: 7:2011cv08149
Filed: November 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: Westchester
Presiding Judge: Cathy Seibel
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 133 OPINION & ORDER re: 112 SECOND MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Midland Funding, LLC, Midland Credit Management, Inc. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's § 5-501 and § 190.4 0 claims, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's FDCPA and GBL § 349 claims. Plaintiff's motion for class certification as modified above is GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court certifies: 1. A Rule 23(b)(2) injunctive and declaratory relief class comprising all persons residing in New York who were sent a letter by Defendants attempting to collect interest in excess of 25% per annum regarding debts incurred for personal, family, or household purposes, whose cardholder agreements: (i) pu rport to be governed by the law of a state that, like Delaware's, provides for no usury cap; or (ii) select no law other than New York. This class covers only claims arising out of GBL violations from November 10, 2008 through today's date. 2. A Rule 23(b)(3) damages class comprising all persons residing in New York who were sent a letter by Defendants attempting to collect interest in excess of 25% per annum regarding debts incurred for personal, family, or household purposes, wh ose cardholder agreements: (i) purport to be governed by the law of a state that, like Delaware's, provides for no usury cap; or (ii) select no law other than New York. This class comprises two subclasses: (a) for claims arising out of GBL viola tions from November 10, 2008 through today's date; and (b) for claims arising out of FDCPA violations from November 10, 2010 through today's date. The Clerk of Court shall terminate the pending motions. (Docs. 99, 112.) The parties shall appear for a conference on March 8, 2017 at 3:00 PM. SO ORDERED., (Status Conference set for 3/8/2017 at 03:00 PM before Judge Cathy Seibel.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 2/27/17) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Saliha Madden
Represented By: O. Randolph Bragg
Represented By: Daniel Adam Schlanger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Funding, LLC
Represented By: Thomas Arthur Leghorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Represented By: Thomas Arthur Leghorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?