Rennalls v. Westchester County Department of Corrections et al
| Wayne Rennalls |
| Westchester County Department of Corrections, Valhalla Jail, Roland Alfredo, Priest, Westchester County, CCS Medical Department and John Doe date 12-1-11 of NP-D-Block Control bubble |
| 7:2012cv05300 |
| July 6, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| New York |
| Kenneth M. Karas |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
119
OPINION AND ORDER: In light of the foregoing analysis, the Court grants the County Defendants' Motion To Dismiss without prejudice. The Court grants Correct Care's Motion To Dismiss as to Plaintiff's failure to protect claim, witho ut prejudice, and denies the Motion with respect to the deliberate indifference and state tort law claims. As noted, even though Plaintiff has filed several amended complaints in this Action, because this is the first adjudication on Defendants� 39; Motion to Dismiss, the claims that are dismissed are dismissed without prejudice and Plaintiff may file a Seventh Amended Complaint within thirty days of this Opinion and Order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motions. (Dkt. Nos. 89, 94.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/30/2015) (lnl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
