On-Time Disposal Inc. v. North Jersey Recycling, LLC
| On-Time Disposal Inc. |
| North Jersey Recycling, LLC |
| North Jersey Recycling, LLC |
| On-Time Disposal Inc. |
| 7:2012cv06300 |
| August 17, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Orange |
| Edgardo Ramos |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
OPINION AND ORDER: For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff is entitled to the entry of a judgment in its favor and against Defendant North in the amount of $325,000.00. Plaintiff is further entitled to the entry of a judgment in its favor and against Defendant Guido in the amount of $187,500.00. Plaintiff is deemed to have a security interest in Defendant North's accounts receivables and is entitled to receive the relevant "Tishman" documents described in the Se ttlement. Plaintiffs application seeking the appointment of a receiver is denied without prejudice to renew upon the appropriate showing of clear necessity. Plaintiff is directed to submit to the Court a proposed consent judgment in accordance with this Opinion and Order within 21 days hereof. The Clerk of the Court is directed to terminate the motion at Docket No. 54. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 9/17/2015) (lnl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
