James v. Osborne
Plaintiff: James Armand
Defendant: Jennifer Osborne, R. Simonson, Mosko and Wiliams
Case Number: 7:2012cv07709
Filed: October 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: Cayuga
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M. Karas
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 30, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 120 OPINION & ORDER re: 102 MOTION for Summary Judgment (Defendants' Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment). filed by Vincent C. Sullivan, Lt. Fredericks, Investigator Manywither, C. Petterson, RN, R. Simonson, T. Thomas, Josep h Piersma., (Investigator Manywither terminated.) The Court grants Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Peterson and at this time denies it with respect to the PLRA issue. Because the "Seventh Amendment does not guar antee a jury trial on factual disputes regarding administrative exhaustion under the PLRA," Messa v. Goord, 652 F.3d 305, 310 (2d Cir. 2011) (per curiam), and because courts in th[e] [Second] Circuit have held pre-trial evidentiary hearings on exhaustion when the question cannot be resolved based on the parties' submissions," Gomez v. Chill, No. 11-CV-6844, 2015 WL 1853110, at *6 n.3 (S.D.N.Y. Apr. 17, 2015) (collecting cases), adopted by 2015 WL 3862709 (S.D.N.Y. June 9, 2015 ), the Court will hold an evidentiary hearing concerning whether Plaintiff's claim may proceed notwithstanding her apparent failure to exhaust his administrative remedies under the PLRA on April 27, 2016, at 3:00pm. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion, (Dkt. No. 102), and remove Manywether- whose name appears on the docket as "Investigator Manywither" - from the docket pursuant to the Court's memo-endorsements, (see Dkt. Nos. 73, 88). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/30/16) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Armand
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jennifer Osborne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R. Simonson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mosko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wiliams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?