Allen v. NYC Department of Enviornmental Protection

Justia Dockets & Filings Second Circuit New York Southern District Allen v. NYC Department of Enviornmental Protection

Allen v. NYC Department of Enviornmental Protection

Plaintiff:	Lionel Allen
Defendant:	NYC Department of Enviornmental Protection
Case Number:	7:2013cv00203
Filed:	January 8, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	Foley Square Office
County:	New York
Presiding Judge:	Edgardo Ramos
Nature of Suit:	Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 27, 2016	Filing 90 OPINION & ORDER re: 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by New York City Department of Environmental Protection, City of New York. For the reasons set forth above, defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at ECF No. 64 and to terminate this action. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/27/2016) (lmb)
September 30, 2014	Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted with respect to Plaintiffs§ 1981 claims and denied with respect to Plaintiffs other claims. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion, (se e Dkt. No. 29), and to substitute the City of New York for the New York City Department of Environmental Protection as the Defendant in this Action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/30/2014) (See OPINION AND ORDER as set forth) (lnl)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 27, 2016

Filing 90 OPINION & ORDER re: 64 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by New York City Department of Environmental Protection, City of New York. For the reasons set forth above, defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close the motion at ECF No. 64 and to terminate this action. (As further set forth in this Order) (Signed by Judge Katherine B. Forrest on 1/27/2016) (lmb)

September 30, 2014

Filing 39 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted with respect to Plaintiffs§ 1981 claims and denied with respect to Plaintiffs other claims. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion, (se e Dkt. No. 29), and to substitute the City of New York for the New York City Department of Environmental Protection as the Defendant in this Action. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/30/2014) (See OPINION AND ORDER as set forth) (lnl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allen v. NYC Department of Enviornmental Protection
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lionel Allen
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: NYC Department of Enviornmental Protection
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?