Leavey v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Theatrical Teamsters Local Union No. 817 et al
Thomas Leavey |
International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Theatrical Teamsters Local Union No. 817 and Thomas J. O'Donnell |
7:2013cv00705 |
January 31, 2013 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Rockland |
Edgardo Ramos |
Labor: Reporting/Disclosure |
29 U.S.C. ยง 185 Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 31 OPINION & ORDER re: 15 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Thomas J. O'Donnell, International Brotherhood of Teamsters - Theatrical Teamsters Local Union No. 817. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion for summary j udgment is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiff's claims under LMRDA Sections 201 and 101(a)(2) and DENIED with respect to Plaintiff's claim under LMRDA Section 104. The Court additionally GRANTS summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim that Defendants breached their duty of fair representation in their operation of the job referral system and DENIES summary judgment on Plaintiff's claim that Defendants breached their duty of fair representation with respect to the provision of job referral information. The Court respectfully directs the Clerk to terminate the motion at ECF No. 15. The parties are directed to appear for a pretrial conference on November 23, 2015 at 10:30 AM. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 10/5/2015) (mml) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.