Albritton v. Morris et al
| Jemal Albritton |
| S. Morris, Tokarz, Gonyo, Fitzpatrick, Blott, Sawyer, William A. Lee, R. Ryan, O'Connor, McDonough and Brian Fisher |
| 7:2013cv03708 |
| May 30, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Clinton |
| Kenneth M. Karas |
| Prisoner: Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
157
OPINION AND ORDER. For the foregoing reasons, the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Defendants Lee, O'Connor, Tokarz, Sawyer, and Ryan is granted. The Court will hold a conference on May 2, 2018 at 10:00 a.m. to discuss the status of the rema ining claims against Morris, Gonyo, Fitzpatrick, Blott, and McDonough. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending Motion, (Dkt. No. 120), and mail a copy of this Opinion to Plaintiff. SO ORDERED. re: 120 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by R. Ryan, William A. Lee, Tokarz, Sawyer, O'Connor. (R. Ryan, Sawyer, Tokarz, William A. Lee and O'Connor terminated). (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/29/2018) (rjm)
|
|
Filing
71
OPINION & ORDER re: 58 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by S. Morris, William A. Lee, Tokarz, O'Connor. The Court grants Defendants' Motion in part, and dismisses Plaintiff's claims to the extent that they are rooted in conduct barred by the statute of limitations, and Plaintiff's claims against Tokarz for First Amendment retaliation. These dismissals are without prejudice, meaning that Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to amend his Complaint, but he must do so within 30 days. In particular, because Defendants did not seek dismissal of Plaintiff's claims from 2009 and early 2010, the Court invites Plaintiff to set forth in his Amended Complaint any facts sufficient to conclude that they a re timely in his Amended Complaint. Defendants' Motion is in all other respects denied. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion. (See Dkt. No. 58.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/30/16) (yv)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
