Wright et al v. Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff: Sandra Wright and Rick Wright
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Case Number: 7:2013cv04099
Filed: June 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: XX Out of State
Presiding Judge: Kenneth M Karas
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 44 STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND RETAINING JURISDICTION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint, claims, and causes of action are dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party because the parties have reached a full and final resolution of the above action. The Court retains jurisdiction over the parties' Confidential Settlement Agreement and General Release. SO STIPULATED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 4/26/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. Per chambers direction, this document has been filed in all member/related actions. (mml)
April 24, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER: On September 14, 2017, the Court extended Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Motion for Class Certification to November 6, 2017, and stated that there would be no more extensions. (Order (Dkt. No. 147).) However, as of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not filed their Motion or otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the status of this Action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs have until May 29, 2018 to file their Motion for Class Certification. There will be no more extensions. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 5/29/2018.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 4/23/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. Per chambers direction, this document has been filed in all related actions. (mml)
September 14, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 42 STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FORD'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION: granting #41 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. IT IS ORDERED as follows: Ford's deadline to file its Answer to Plaintiffs' SAC is extended to October 30, 2017, and Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Motion for Class Certification is extended to November 6, 2017. There will be no more extensions, and as further set forth in this order. (Docketed in 13md2450 and all associated cases) Motion due 11/6/2017. Ford Motor Company answer due 10/30/2017; Ford Motor Company answer due 10/30/2017 (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/14/2017) (ap) Modified on 9/14/2017 (ap). Modified on 9/14/2017 (ap).
September 14, 2017 Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 11/6/2017. (ap)
September 13, 2017 Filing 41 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated September 13, 2017. Document filed by Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Co., Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Fazio, Peter)
August 15, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 40 STIPULATION ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FORD'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION: IT IS ORDERED as follows: Ford's deadline to file its Answer to Plaintiffs' SAC is extended to September 13, 2017, and Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Motion for Class Certification is extended to September 22, 2017. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 8/14/2017). ( Motions due by 9/22/2017.), Motions terminated: (33 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK, 58 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 143 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 21 in 7:15-cv-06107-KMK, 31 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 46 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-05556-KMK, 32 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK, 37 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 58 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 21 in 7:15-cv-06107-KMK, 31 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 32 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-05556-KMK, 46 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 37 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK) FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017. FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017 filed by Ford Motor Co., Ford Motor Company. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(ama) Modified on 8/15/2017 (ama).
August 15, 2017 Set/Reset Deadlines: Ford Motor Company answer due 9/13/2017. (ama)
August 13, 2017 Filing 39 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017., FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017. Document filed by Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Co., Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Stipulation Order Extending Time to Answer and to File Motion)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Fazio, Peter)
July 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 38 OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant is directed to file an Answer to the SAC within 20 days from the date of this Opinion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close case numbers 13-CV-906, 13-CV-1144, 13-CV-4099, 13-CV-4101, 13-CV-4150, 13-CV-4235, 13-CV-4236, 13-CV-4237, 13-CV-4242, 13-CV-4243, 13-CV-4316, 13-CV-4318, 13-CV-4611, 13-CV-4612, 13-CV-5556, and 15-CV-6107, terminate the pending Motion (Dkt. No. 100), and dismiss all Plaintiffs, except for Richard Pitkin, Dennis Harkins, Gregory Holman, and Leah Broome. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 7/24/2017) (mml)
June 26, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 37 MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: (139 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK) Letter, filed by Rick Wright, Richard Fox, William Huff, Kelly Wolverton, James DeVito, Angela Boykin, Douglas McVay, Allen Bluhm, Lawrence Moss, Dennis Harkins, Naomi Teppich, Stanley Lindsey, Jeremie Kahler, Dewayne McDaniel, Gary Druckenmiller, Nan Le-Khanh Lewis, Burneta Barley, Lori Schneider, Donna Stimmel, Guy Mossman, Nathan Montijo, Michael Tannhauser, Charles Savage, Lori Zafonte, Kermit Wilkins, Steven Yamin, Matthew Romak, Dean Wilkins, Johanna Fontenot, Robert Renteria, Gregory Yorton, Stephen Brand, Mark Goodale, Jeremy Dobbs, Martin Springhetti, Gary Zack, Leo Rowe, Patricia Lazuka, Young Kwun, Michael W McComas, Peter Patroni, Dean Majkrzak, Bruce Klafter, Keith Howe, Adele Rovetto, Leah Broome, Sylvester Lazuka, Michel Jocelyn, Alfonso Lerma, April Tibbetts, Michael Hendrickson, Dave Deluca, Christian Nielsen, Pedro Magana, Susan Pliner, Sandra Wright, Elizabeth Lindsey, Charles Zafonte, Richard Weglarz, James Griffiths, Amber Kahler, Gregory Holman, Matthew Parkhurst, Marianne Cibeu, Raymond Belden, Phillip Rider, Neal Schneider, Roger Ritten, Richard Pitkin, C Diane Sikes, James Oldcorn, Angel Rivera, Claudia McDaniel, Gary Cole, Robert Fellows, Octavio Hoyos, L David Sikes. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 6/26/2017) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(ama)
January 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 36 SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is to be tried to a jury. No additional parties may be joined except with leave of the Court. Amended pleadings may not be filed except with leave of the Court. Depositions due by 1/26/2017. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/20/2017) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. (lnl)
January 12, 2017 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth M. Karas: Interim Pretrial Conference held on 1/12/2017. Elaine Kusel appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Peter Fazio and David George appeared on behalf of Defendant. Angela O'Donnell served as court reporter. For the reasons stated on the record, the discovery requests Plaintiffs make in their November 17, 2016 letter (Dkt. No. 125), are denied. (Court Reporter Angela O'Donnell) Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(BF)
August 8, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 35 JOINT ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR NON-PARTIES re: (23 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 26 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 28 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 26 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 29 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 66 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 37 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 29 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 28 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 48 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 24 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 24 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 12 in 7:13-cv-05556-KMK, 23 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK) Protective Order. On December 12, 2013, this Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order in this case "[i]n order to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of certain confidential, commercial and/or proprietary documents produced in this action" [Dkt. No. 66]. The Protective Order ("Order") applied to documents that "a party" sought to designate as confidential, and outlined the rights of the entity producing the documents. (See, e.g., 2(a), 2(c)). Most portions of the Order used the term "producing party" rather than "party." Id. at 6(b), 7(c), 9, and 11(c). The intent of the Order was to extend beyond the parties to this lawsuit and apply to any "producing entity," including any non-party responding to discovery. (Note the use of the term "designating party or non-party" in Paragraph 3(a)). To the extent the Order was unclear, the Court clarifies that a "producing party" or "designating party" need not be a party in this lawsuit, but can be any entity responding to discovery in this case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 8/7/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(yv)
April 20, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting (102) Motion for Emily J. Kirk to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02450-KMK. The motion of EMILY J. KIRK, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 4/20/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. (yv)
April 1, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 33 STIPULATED ORDER GOVERNING THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED AND OTHER INFORMATION: It is ORDERED as follows: I. IDENTIFICATION OF CUSTODIANS AND LOCATION OF INFORMATION. A. Custodians. Ford Motor Company ("Ford") agrees to provide a reasonable and proportional list of document custodians that it has identified as potentially containing relevant documents. If the Parties agree to stagger discovery (e.g., by issue, category of information, etc.) the custodian list will be updated within a reasonable time shortly thereafter as the Parties proceed to the next agreed upon stage of discovery. The custodian list will include a description of the proposed custodians' job title and a brief description of such person's relevant responsibilities (including relevant dates of employment by the applicable party). The parties retain the right, upon reviewing the initial production of documents, and conducting other investigation and discovery, to request that files from additional custodians be searched and to meet and confer regarding such requests. B. Location of Information. Ford may support its claims and defenses using hard copy documents and ESI including, but not limited to, email and electronic documents such as those created with Microsoft Office, and with certain engineering or manufacturing applications. Hard-copy documents may be located in various locations throughout Ford (see Section II below for production format details). ESI may be located in employee laptop/desktop hard drives, various tile and print servers, email servers, portable media (such as CDs and DVDs), mainframe computers, electronic document repositories, proprietary databases, and application databases. In addition to the custodian identification described above, the parties will identify and describe any relevant, non-privileged electronic systems and storage locations that may contain information proportionate and relevant to the claims and/or defenses. If the Parties agree to stagger discovery (e.g., by issue, category of information, etc.), the identification and description of sources will be updated within a reasonable time shortly thereafter as the Parties proceed to the next agreed upon stage of discovery. C. Easily Segregable Documents. Documents or categories of documents that are easily identifiable and segregable shall be collected without the use of search terms or other agreed upon advanced search methodology (e.g. analytics, predictive coding, technology-assisted-review). Where potentially responsive ESI shall be searched through the use of search terms, if any, the parties agree to follow the process identified below and the parties shall meet and confer regarding any proposed deviation. D. Search Terms. Where the Parties agree that identifying potentially responsive ESI through the use of search terms is appropriate, the parties will provide the list of search terms used or proposed to filter data to the opposing party. To the extent reasonably possible, search terms will be crafted with input from the custodians in order to identify appropriate nomenclature, code words, etc. Within 7 days of the producing party's identification of search terms, the receiving party shall propose any additional terms that the party reasonably believes would yield responsive, relevant documents. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the proposed search terms within five business days of receipt of the additional search terms and attempt to reach a compromise within one week. The use of a search term hit list, proposal of alternate terms and/or other reasonable methods shall be used, as appropriate, in order to attempt to agree upon any modifications to the set of search terms. If disputed terms still exist at the end of the meet and confer process, the parties will submit those terms to the Court in the form of a joint discovery letter with a discussion of the relevance and/or burden associated with those search terms. The inclusion of this paragraph should not be construed as an agreement that search terms are necessary or required to identify potentially responsive ESI. E. Technology Assisted Review. No party shall use predictive coding/technology-assisted review for the purpose of culling out documents from the review population without written consent of the opposing party or an order from the court and assumes that the parties will negotiate a separate mutually agreeable protocol for the use of such technologies. II. PRODUCTION OF HARD COPY DOCUMENTS. A. Format. Except as noted below, hard copy documents not otherwise converted to another format should be scanned as single-page, Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with an.opt image cross reference file and a delimited database load file (i.e. .dat). The database load file should contain the following fields: "BEGNO", "ENDNO", "PAGES", "VOLUME" and "CUSTODIAN." The documents should be logically unitized (i.e. distinct documents shall not be merged into a single record, and single documents shall not be split into multiple records) and be produced, where reasonably feasible, in the order in which they are kept in the usual course of business. If an original document contains color to understand the meaning or content of the document, the document shall be produced as single-page, 300 DPI JPG images with JPG compression and a high quality setting as to not degrade the original image. Multi-page OCR text for each document should also be provided. The OCR software shall maximize text quality over process speed, where reasonably feasible. Settings such as "auto-skewing" and "auto-rotation" should be turned on during the OCR process. Parties are under no obligation to enhance an image beyond how it was kept in the usual course of business. If producing the hard copy documents in the above format creates an undue burden that exceeds the benefit (for example, if applying OCR to the documents is expensive and/or of marginal utility or if logically unitizing the documents creates an undue burden), the parties will meet and confer regarding an alternative format, such as making the documents available in hard copy, as they were kept in the ordinary course of business. III. PRODUCTION OF ESI. A. Format. The parties will produce ESI in single-page, black and white, TIFF Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with the exception of spreadsheet type files, Excel files, audio, and video files, which shall be produced in native format. TIFFS will show any and all text and images which would be visible to the reader using the native software that created the document, where reasonably feasible. For example, TIFFS of email messages should include the BCC line. PowerPoint documents shall be processed with hidden slides and all speaker notes unhidden, and shall be processed to show both the slide and the speaker's notes on the TIFF image. If an original document contains color and a color version is needed to understand the meaning and content of the document, the document should be produced either in native format, or as single page, 300 DPI JPG images with JPG compression and a high quality setting as to not degrade the original image. Parties are under no obligation to enhance an image beyond how it was kept in the usual course of business. If a document is produced in native format, a single page bates stamped image slip-sheet stating the document has been produced in native format will also be provided. Each native file should be named according to the Bates number it has been assigned, and should be linked directly to its corresponding record in the load file using the NATIVELINK field. To the extent that either party believes that specific documents or classes of documents, not already identified within this protocol, should be produced in native format, the parties agree to meet and confer in good faith. B. De-Duplication. Each party may remove exact duplicate documents based on MD5 or SHA-1 hash values, at the family level. Attachments should not be eliminated as duplicates for purposes of production, unless the parent email and all attachments are also duplicates. Parties agree that an email that includes content in the BCC or other blind copy field shall not be treated as a duplicate of an email that does not include content in those fields, even if all remaining content in the email is identical. The parties do not currently agree to removal of near-duplicates. If a party seeks to modify this agreement (e.g. removal of duplicative, non-inclusive e-mail threads and other de-duplication techniques), the party must do so such that it will not cause an unreasonable delay in production. The party will promptly request a meet and confer, prior to production, and with ample opportunity for the receiving party to seek court intervention if the parties are not able to come to a mutual agreement. De-duplication may be done across the entire collection (global de-duplication), but if it is done across the entire collection, a Duplicate Custodian field will be provided, which will include, for each document, the names of the custodians whose data was deduplicated in processing for that document. Should the custodian metadata field produced become outdated due to rolling productions, an overlay file providing all the custodians for the affected documents will be produced prior to substantial completion of the document production. If the receiving party identifies a document or a select number of documents for which the file path is purportedly relevant to the issues, the parties agree to meet and confer about providing file path metadata for such a limited population of documents. C. Metadata. All ESI will be produced with a delimited, database load file that contains the metadata fields listed in Table 1, where reasonably available, attached hereto. D. Embedded Objects The parties agree that embedded documents will be separated out as attachments unless it causes inefficiencies or an undue burden and in that case, will meet and confer regarding the issue. E. Compressed Files Types. Compressed file types (i.e. .ZIP,.RAR,.CAB,.Z) should be decompressed so that the lowest level document or file is extracted, where reasonably feasible. F. Structured Data
March 9, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 32 CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is to be tried to a jury. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification shall be filed no later than 10/12/2016. Ford's Response shall be filed no later than 12/14/2016. Plaintiffs' Reply shall be filed no later than 2/16/2017. Deposition related to Phase 1 to be completed by 8/1/2016. Phase 1 Fact Discovery is to be completed no later than August 1, 2016, and the deadline for all fact discovery is due by 3/16/2017. Initial disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., will be completed no later than 3/25/2016. The parties do not request a settlement conference before a United States Magistrate Judge. The parties do not request that the case be referred to the Court's Mediation Program. The parties will consider use a privately-retained mediator at a later date. The last day for mediation is March 16, 2017. Remand of these multi-district proceedings is required before trial. There will be no extensions of the discovery schedule without the permission of the Court, nor should counsel assume that any extensions will be granted. Counsel may seek permission for an extension of the discovery deadline of the magistrate judge to whom the case is referred, but only after consenting to allowing the magistrate judge handle the case for all purposes. Next Case Management Conference set for 10/13/2016 at 11:30 AM before Judge Kenneth M. Karas. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/8/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(yv)
February 11, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MOTION SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendant shall submit its Motion to Dismiss by no later than April 1, 2016. Plaintiffs shall file their response by May 2, 2016. Defendant shall submit its reply by no later than June 2, 2016. Sur-reply papers will not be accepted unless prior permission of the Court is given. So Ordered. (Motions due by 4/1/2016. Responses due by 5/2/2016. Replies due by 6/2/2016.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 2/11/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(yv) Modified on 2/11/2016 (yv).
November 12, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 30 OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. To the extent that Plaintiffs make claims based on the mere use of EPA fuel economy estimates in advertisements or on Monroney Stickers, those claims are dismissed because they are preempted by federal law and, in any event, fail to state a claim. Additionally, Plaintiffs' MMW A claim and unjust enrichment claim under California and New York law are dismissed. The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the Motion. (Dkt. No. 63.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 11/12/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. (lnl) (Main Document 82 replaced on 11/17/2015) (mml). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2015: #1 Part 2) (mml)
August 4, 2015 NOTICE OF REDESIGNATION TO ANOTHER MAGISTRATE JUDGE. The above entitled action has been redesignated to Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison. Please note that this is a reassignment of the designation only. (sjo)
December 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 29 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER...regarding procedures to be followed that shall govern the handling of confidential material... (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 12/12/2013) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. (lnl)
August 6, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (23 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 23 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 20 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 41 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK, 27 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK, 25 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK, 28 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 25 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 27 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 27 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 47 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 19 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK) MOTION for Richard Dale McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice [CORRECTED]. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. MOTION for Richard Dale McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice [CORRECTED]. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. MOTION for Richard Dale McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice [CORRECTED]. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. MOTION for Richard Dale McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice [CORRECTED]. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. MOTION for Richard Dale McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice [CORRECTED]. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. MOTION for Richard Dale McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice [CORRECTED]. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. Incorrect case numbers on the Motions and Prosed Orders. You cannot spread text into other cases. The fee for the Motion for Pro Hac Vice is $200.00 per Case. Please call the Help Desk for guidance 212-805-0800. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(bcu)
August 5, 2013 Filing 28 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Richard Dale McCune to Appear Pro Hac Vice [CORRECTED]. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Burneta Barley, Raymond Belden, Allen Bluhm, Angela Boykin, Stephen Brand, Marianne Cibeu, Gary Cole, Jeremy Dobbs, Does, Gary Druckenmiller, Robert Fellows, Johanna Fontenot, Ford Motor Company, Richard Fox, Mark Goodale, Dennis Harkins, Gregory Holman, Keith Howe, Octavio Hoyos, William Huff, Michel Jocelyn, Amber Kahler, Jeremie Kahler, Bruce Klafter, Young Kwun, Patricia Lazuka, Sylvester Lazuka, Alfonso Lerma, Nan Le-Khanh Lewis, Elizabeth Lindsey, Stanley Lindsey, Pedro Magana, Dean Majkrzak, Michael W McComas, Claudia McDaniel, Dewayne McDaniel, Douglas McVay, Nathan Montijo, Lawrence Moss, Guy Mossman, Christian Nielsen, James Oldcorn, Matthew Parkhurst, Peter Patroni, Richard Pitkin, Susan Pliner, Robert Renteria, Phillip Rider, Roger Ritten, Angel Rivera, Adele Rovetto, Leo Rowe, Charles Savage, Lori Schneider, Neal Schneider, C Diane Sikes, L David Sikes, Martin Springhetti, Donna Stimmel, Michael Tannhauser, Naomi Teppich, April Tibbetts, Richard Weglarz, Kermit Wilkins, Rick Wright, Sandra Wright, Steven Yamin, Gregory Yorton, Gary Zack, Charles Zafonte, Lori Zafonte. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(McCune, Richard) Modified on 8/6/2013 (bcu).
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting (31) Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02450-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04316-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04101-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04099-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04102-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04152-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04150-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-01144-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04235-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04236-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04237-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04242-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04243-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04318-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04611-KMK; granting [] Motion for Geoffrey Alan Munroe to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04612-KMK (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Kenneth M. Karas)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Karas, Kenneth)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting (27) Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02450-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04316-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04101-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04099-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04102-KMK; granting (42) Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04152-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04150-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-01144-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04235-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04236-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04237-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04242-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04243-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04318-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04611-KMK; granting [] Motion for Jodi Munn Schebel to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04612-KMK (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Kenneth M. Karas)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Karas, Kenneth)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting (26) Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02450-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04316-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04101-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04099-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04102-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04152-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04150-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-01144-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04235-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04236-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04237-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04242-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04243-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04318-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04611-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cynthia B. Chapman to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04612-KMK (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Kenneth M. Karas)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Karas, Kenneth)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting (24) Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02450-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04316-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04101-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04099-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04102-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04152-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04150-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-01144-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04235-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04236-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04237-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04242-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04243-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04318-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04611-KMK; granting [] Motion for Michael A. Caddell to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04612-KMK (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Kenneth M. Karas)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Karas, Kenneth)
July 31, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting (23) Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02450-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04316-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04101-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04099-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04102-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04152-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04150-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-01144-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04235-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04236-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04237-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04242-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04243-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04318-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04611-KMK; granting [] Motion for Cory S. Fein to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-cv-04612-KMK (HEREBY ORDERED by Judge Kenneth M. Karas)(Text Only Order) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Karas, Kenneth)
July 29, 2013 Filing 22 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Richard Dale McCune, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8733348. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Richard Pitkin. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(McCune, Richard) Modified on 7/29/2013 (bcu).
July 29, 2013 Filing 21 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT DOCKET ENTRY - MOTION for Mark J. Dearman to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice -. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8731774. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff. Document filed by Pedro Magana. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Dearman, Mark) Modified on 7/29/2013 (wb).
July 29, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (18 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 16 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 15 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 20 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 15 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 20 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK, 29 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 28 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK, 20 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 18 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 14 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 14 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 16 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 13 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 12 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK) MOTION for Mark J. Dearman to Appear Pro Hac Vice - Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice -. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8731774. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.>/B. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Please call the ECF helpdesk at 212-805-0800 for instructions on re-filing Pro Hac Vice. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(wb)
July 29, 2013 >>>NOTICE REGARDING DEFICIENT MOTION TO APPEAR PRO HAC VICE. Notice regarding Document No. (29 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK, 17 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK, 15 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 14 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 19 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 15 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 13 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK, 30 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 16 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 16 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK, 19 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 17 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK) MOTION for Richard Dale McCune, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 200.00, receipt number 0208-8733348. Motion and supporting papers to be reviewed by Clerk's Office staff.. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Missing Certificate of Good Standing. Certificate of Good Standing must be issued from the State Court of California and not a State Bar Association.Please call the ECF helpdesk at 212-805-0800 for instructions on re-filing Pro Hac Vice.. Re-file the document as a Corrected Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice and attach a valid Certificate of Good Standing, issued within the past 30 days. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(bcu)
July 18, 2013 Filing 20 INITIAL REPORT OF PARTIES BEFORE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. - Initial Report of Parties Pursuant to Standing Order M10-468 Re: Pilot Program - Document filed by Ford Motor Company.Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Rudman, Samuel)
June 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 19 STANDING ORDER IN RE PILOT PROJECT REGARDING CASE MANAGEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR COMPLEX CIVIL CASES IN THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (See M-10-468 Order filed November 1, 2011). This case is hereby designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases in the Southern District of New York (the Pilot Project), unless the judge to whom this case is assigned determines otherwise. This case is designated for inclusion in the Pilot Project because it is a class action, an MDL action, or is in one of the following Nature of Suit categories: 160, 245, 315, 355, 365, 385, 410, 830, 840, 850, 893, or 950. The presiding judge in a case that does not otherwise qualify for inclusion in the Pilot Project may nevertheless designate the case for inclusion in the Pilot Project by issuing an order directing that the case be included in the Pilot Project. The description of the Pilot Project, including procedures to be followed, is attached to this Order. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 7:13-md-02450-KMK. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 10/31/2011) (sjo)
June 14, 2013 Filing 18 MDL TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - District of New Mexico; Case Number: 1:13-cv-00292. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received. (sjo)
June 14, 2013 CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 7:13-md-02450-KMK. (sjo)
June 14, 2013 CONSOLIDATED MDL CASE: Create association to 7:13-md-02450-KMK. (sjo)
June 14, 2013 NOTE TO OUT OF STATE ATTORNEYS: Please visit the Court's website at http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov for information regarding admission to the S.D.N.Y. Bar and the CM/ECF Rules & Filing Instructions. (sjo)
June 14, 2013 Magistrate Judge George A. Yanthis is so designated. (sjo)
June 14, 2013 Case Designated ECF. (sjo)
June 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 TRANSFER ORDER re #16 Order on Motion to Stay by District Judge Judith C. Herrera transferring case to MDL Panel for the Southern District of New York (MDL No. 2450) (Doc. No. 30) (rw) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
April 25, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING DECISION BY THE JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION by Magistrate Judge Robert Hayes Scott granting #15 Motion to Stay. (mg) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
April 23, 2013 Filing 15 MOTION to Stay Litigation Pending Decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Croasdell, Jeffrey) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
April 16, 2013 Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey M. Croasdell on behalf of Ford Motor Company (Croasdell, Jeffrey) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
April 16, 2013 Filing 13 STIPULATION for Extension of Time by Ford Motor Company (Croasdell, Jeffrey) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
April 2, 2013 Filing 12 NOTICE REGARDING DOCUMENT ENTRIES: Because this case has been reassigned to a district judge, please be advised that any documents filed by the parties under Rule 73(b) have been permanently removed from the docket. Document(s) removed: No. 10. [THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (rw) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 28, 2013 Filing 11 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been reassigned to District Judge Judith C. Herrera as the trial judge. Under D.N.M.LR-Civ. 10.1, the first page of each document must have the case file number and initials of the assigned judges.Accordingly, further documents filed in this matter must bear the case number and the judges' initials shown in the case caption and the NEF for this document. Kindly reflect this change in your filings. Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. Garcia no longer assigned to this case.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 27, 2013 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Sandra Wright, Rick Wright. Ford Motor Company served on 3/27/2013, answer due 4/17/2013. (Hnasko, Thomas) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 27, 2013 Filing 8 NOTICE by Rick Wright, Sandra Wright Notice of Good Standing of Attorneys Licensed Outside the District (Hnasko, Thomas) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 27, 2013 Filing 7 Association Dues: $ 300.00 paid, receipt number # SF001836 re: 4 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Plaintiff Rick Wright, Plaintiff Sandra Wright, 3 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Plaintiff Rick Wright, Plaintiff Sandra Wright, 2 Association of Attorney Licensed Outside the District, filed by Plaintiff Rick Wright, Plaintiff Sandra Wright. (gr)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 27, 2013 Filing 6 Filing fee: $ 350.00, receipt number SF001835 re #1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint against Ford Motor Company ( Filing Fee - Deliver Payment), filed by Sandra Wright and Rick Wright. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hnasko, Thomas) Modified text on 3/27/2013 (eh). filed by Sandra Wright. (gr)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 27, 2013 Filing 5 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this case has been randomly assigned to United States Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. Garcia to conduct dispositive proceedings in this matter, including motions and trial. Appeal from a judgment entered by a Magistrate Judge will be to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is the responsibility of the case filer to serve a copy of this Notice upon all parties with the summons and complaint. Consent is strictly voluntary, and a party is free to withhold consent without adverse consequences. Should a party choose to consent, notice should be made no later than 21 days after entry of the Order setting the Rule 16 Initial Scheduling Conference. For e-filers, visit our Web site at www.nmcourt.fed.us for more information and instructions.[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] (ln) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 27, 2013 United States Magistrate Judge Lorenzo F. Garcia and United States Magistrate Judge Robert Hayes Scott assigned. (ln) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 27, 2013 Summons Issued as to Ford Motor Company. (ln) [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 26, 2013 Filing 4 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Plaintiffs Rick Wright, Sandra Wright by Thomas M. Hnasko on behalf of: Scott Grzenczyk Girard Gibbs LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400San Francisco, CA 94104 415-981-4800 smg@girardgibbs.com (Association Dues - Deliver Payment) (Hnasko, Thomas)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 26, 2013 Filing 3 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Plaintiffs Rick Wright, Sandra Wright by Thomas M. Hnasko on behalf of: Dylan Hughes Girard Gibbs LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400San Francisco, CA 94104 415-981-4800 dsh@girardgibbs.com (Association Dues - Deliver Payment) (Hnasko, Thomas)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 26, 2013 Filing 2 ASSOCIATION of Attorney Licensed Outside the District for Plaintiffs Rick Wright, Sandra Wright by Thomas M. Hnasko on behalf of: Eric H. Gibbs Girard Gibbs LLP 601 California Street, Suite 1400San Francisco, CA 94104 415-981-4800 ehg@girardgibbs.com (Association Dues - Deliver Payment) (Hnasko, Thomas)[THIS IS A TEXT-ONLY ENTRY. THERE ARE NO DOCUMENTS ATTACHED.] [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]
March 26, 2013 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Class Action Complaint against Ford Motor Company ( Filing Fee - Deliver Payment), filed by Sandra Wright and Rick Wright. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hnasko, Thomas) Modified text on 3/27/2013 (eh). [Transferred from New Mexico on 6/14/2013.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wright et al v. Ford Motor Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sandra Wright
Represented By: Dylan Hughes
Represented By: Eric H. Gibbs
Represented By: Scott M Grzenczyk
Represented By: Thomas M. Hnasko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rick Wright
Represented By: Dylan Hughes
Represented By: Eric H. Gibbs
Represented By: Scott M Grzenczyk
Represented By: Thomas M. Hnasko
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ford Motor Company
Represented By: Peter Joseph Fazio
Represented By: Jeffrey M. Croasdell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?