Barrett v. City of Newburgh et al
| Virginia D. Barrett |
| City of Newburgh and John Doe |
| 7:2013cv04118 |
| June 14, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Orange |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
OPINION & ORDER re: 37 MOTION to Dismiss filed by Robert Vasta, Joseph Burns. For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint does not relate back to the filing date of her original Complaint. Because Plaintiff filed this action against officers Vasta and Burns nearly two months after the statute oft imitations expired - her claim for excessive force is time-barred. Accordingly, Defendants' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate any pending motions (specifically ECF No. 37), and to close this case. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/22/20) (mml)
|
|
Filing
20
OPINION AND ORDER re: 8 MOTION to Dismiss filed by City of Newburgh. Accordingly, Defendant City of Newburgh's motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion, Docket No. 8, and terminate Defendant City of Newburgh from the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/18/2014) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
