Garner v. Colvin
||Karissa M. Garner
||Carolyn W. Colvin
||August 16, 2013
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||White Plains Office
||Lisa Margaret Smith
|Nature of Suit:
||Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 5, 2017
ORDER for 25 Report and Recommendations,, 22 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings filed by Carolyn W. Colvin, 11 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Karissa M. Garner. Before the Court are Plaintiff's objections, (Doc. 26 ("Obj.")), to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith, ("R&R"), (Doc. 25), recommending that Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings be denied and Defendant's motion for judgmen t on the pleadings be granted. Petitioner's objections are overruled, except as to the consideration of Dr. Harding's report which, as discussed, does not undermine the ALJ's conclusion. I have reviewed the portions of the Petition as to which no objection has been raised, and find no error, clear or otherwise. Thus, with the exception just described, the R&R is adopted as the decision of the Court. Plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings is DENIED, and Defendant's is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the pending motions, (Docs. 11, 22), and close the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/5/17) (yv)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?