Lleshi v. LaClair

Lleshi v. LaClair

Petitioner:	Pal Lleshi
Respondent:	Darwin LaClair
Case Number:	7:2013cv05874
Filed:	August 19, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office:	White Plains Office
County:	Franklin
Presiding Judge:	Vincent L. Briccetti
Presiding Judge:	George A. Yanthis
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 7, 2017	Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER for 32 Report and Recommendations. The R&R is adopted as the opinion of ti.e Court. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. As p etitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue, See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 4/7/2017) (rj)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 7, 2017

Filing 35 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER for 32 Report and Recommendations. The R&R is adopted as the opinion of ti.e Court. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. The Clerk is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. As p etitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right, a certificate of appealability will not issue, See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Love v. McCray, 413 F.3d 192, 195 (2d Cir. 2005). The Court certifies pursuant t o 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 4/7/2017) (rj)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lleshi v. LaClair
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Pal Lleshi
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Darwin LaClair
Represented By:	Leilani Julia Rodriguez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?