Clay v. Fischer et al
Plaintiff: Daniel Clay
Defendant: Brian Fischer, William A. Lee and John or Jane Doe
Case Number: 1:2013cv07662
Filed: October 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: White Plains Office
County: Greene
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 159 OPINION & ORDER re: 117 MOTION to Dismiss the Third Amended Complaint. filed by C. Taliaferro, L. Bacino, William A. Lee, Sergeant Wahlquist, L. Franco, 151 MOTION to Dismiss corrected with Exhibit A. filed by Cousin , Surprenant. In light of the foregoing analysis, the Court grants Defendants' Motion. Plaintiffs Third Amended Complaint is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motions, (Dkt. No. 117, 151 ), to mail a copy of this Opinion & Order to Plaintiff, and to close this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/19/2019) (kv) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing.
January 30, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 70 OPINION & ORDER re: 57 MOTION to Dismiss the Amended Complaint, filed by C. Taliaferro, L. Bacino, William A. Lee, L. Franco. The Court grants Defendants' Motion. The Court notes that Plaintiff has already amended his Complaint twice, and did so once in response to Judge Preska's decision on the merits of his claims. (See Order To Amend (Dkt. No. 18).) However, in light of the fact that Plaintiff is proceeding pro se, and because Judge Preska's Order did not dismi ss Plaintiff's Complaint on the same grounds detailed in this Opinion, the Second Amended Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this Opinion to file a Third Amended Complaint. Failure to honor this deadline could result in dismissal of this Action with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion. (Dkt. No. 57.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/27/17) (yv)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clay v. Fischer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Clay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Brian Fischer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: William A. Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John or Jane Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?