BMR & Associates, LLP et al v. SFW Capital Partners, LLC
| BMR & Associates, LLP and BMR Advisors |
| SFW Capital Partners, LLC |
| 7:2014cv00865 |
| February 10, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| XX Out of U.S. |
| Nelson Stephen Roman |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
OPINION AND ORDER re: 21 MOTION to Dismiss First Amended Complaint filed by SFW Capital Partners, LLC. For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's motion is granted and this case is dismissed. Dismissal is conditioned on: (1) Defenda nt's consent to the jurisdiction of the appropriate Indian courts; (2) Defendant's agreement to waive any statute of limitations defense that has arisen since the commencement of the action in this District; and (3) the willingness of the a ppropriate Indian courts to hear the case. Defendant must notify Plaintiffs and this Court in writing within fifteen days of the date of this Order if it objects to these conditions. Plaintiffs will be permitted to reinstate their suit if Defendant objects or if these conditions are not otherwise met. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at Docket No. 21, and to terminate this case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/10/2015) (mml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
