Pugh v. Orange County Correctional Facility et al
Plaintiff: |
Thomas Pugh, Jr. |
Defendant: |
Orange County Correctional Facility and Carl Dubois |
Case Number: |
1:2014cv04854 |
Filed: |
June 16, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
Office: |
Foley Square Office |
County: |
New York |
Presiding Judge: |
Loretta A. Preska |
Nature of Suit: |
Civil Rights |
Cause of Action: |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
February 29, 2016 |
Filing
49
OPINION AND ORDER re: 34 MOTION to Dismiss . filed by A. Marchini, Pascal, Desena, Shanley, Mendoza, Cintron, Orange County Correctional Facility, R. Potter, Carl Dubois, Worsdale, 38 MOTION to Dismiss action. filed by Maria Karimi, Medical Department at Orange County Correctional Facility. Defendants' motions to dismiss are GRANTED. The Court sua sponte dismisses all claims against defendant "M.D. MCraufd." Plaintiff is granted leave to file a second amended complaint, which must be filed by April 15, 2016. If plaintiff does not file a second amended complaint by that date, this case will he dismissed with prejudice. If appropriate, after the second amended complaint is filed, the Court may issue an amended Order of Service to enable plaintiff to effect service on any defendants who have not already been served. Defendants' time to move, answer, or otherwise respond to the second amended complaint shall he governe d by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motions. (Doc. ##34, 38). The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 5S 91 5(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppede v. United States. 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 2/29/2016) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rj)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?