Vaughn v. Empire City Casino at Yonkers Raceway et al
Parnell Vaughn |
Empire City Casino at Yonkers Raceway, Robert Gatterio, Michael Palmiere and Ryan Monroe |
7:2014cv10297 |
December 30, 2014 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
Westchester |
Kenneth M. Karas |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 102 OPINION & ORDER re: 79 MOTION for Summary Judgment pursuant to FRCP Rule 56, filed by Ryan Monroe, Robert Galterio, Michael Palmiere, Empire City Casino at Yonkers Raceway. The Motion is granted in part and denied in part. Defend ants' Motion is granted with respect to Plaintiff's Title VII and NYSHRL claims for hostile work environment and retaliation, but denied with respect to Plaintiff's Title VII and NYSHRL claims for discrimination. Defendants' Motio n is denied with respect to its effort to limit damages based on the consent award, without prejudice to raise that argument if and when damages are determined by a fact finder. The Court will hold a conference on July 28, 2017 at 2:30 PM. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate the pending Motion, (Dkt. No. 79.), and as further set forth herein. (Status Conference set for 7/28/2017 at 02:30 PM before Judge Kenneth M. Karas.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 7/14/2017) (ras) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.