Dave Deluca v. Ford Motor Company
| Dave Deluca |
| Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 7:2015cv06107 |
| August 4, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| XX Out of State |
| Kenneth M Karas |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 pr Petition for Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 26
STIPULATED ORDER DISMISSING CONSOLIDATED SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND RETAINING JURISDICTION: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Consolidated Second Amended Class Action Complaint, claims, and causes of action are dismissed with prejudice and without costs or fees to any party because the parties have reached a full and final resolution of the above action. The Court retains jurisdiction over the parties' Confidential Settlement Agreement and General Release. SO STIPULATED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 4/26/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. Per chambers direction, this document has been filed in all member/related actions. (mml)
|
|
Filing 25
ORDER: On September 14, 2017, the Court extended Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Motion for Class Certification to November 6, 2017, and stated that there would be no more extensions. (Order (Dkt. No. 147).) However, as of the date of this Order, Plaintiffs have not filed their Motion or otherwise communicated with the Court regarding the status of this Action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs have until May 29, 2018 to file their Motion for Class Certification. There will be no more extensions. SO ORDERED. (Motions due by 5/29/2018.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 4/23/2018) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. Per chambers direction, this document has been filed in all related actions. (mml)
|
|
Filing 24
STIPULATED ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FORD'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION: granting #23 Letter Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. IT IS ORDERED as follows: Ford's deadline to file its Answer to Plaintiffs' SAC is extended to October 30, 2017, and Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Motion for Class Certification is extended to November 6, 2017. There will be no more extensions, and as further set forth in this order. (Docketed in 13md2450 and all associated cases) Motion due 11/6/2017. Ford Motor Company answer due 10/30/2017; Ford Motor Company answer due 10/30/2017 (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 9/14/2017) (ap) Modified on 9/14/2017 (ap). Modified on 9/14/2017 (ap).
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Motions due by 11/6/2017. (ap) |
| Filing 23 SECOND LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated September 13, 2017. Document filed by Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Co., Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Fazio, Peter) |
|
Filing 22
STIPULATION ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FORD'S ANSWER TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION: IT IS ORDERED as follows: Ford's deadline to file its Answer to Plaintiffs' SAC is extended to September 13, 2017, and Plaintiffs' deadline to file their Motion for Class Certification is extended to September 22, 2017. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 8/14/2017). ( Motions due by 9/22/2017.), Motions terminated: (33 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK, 58 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 143 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 21 in 7:15-cv-06107-KMK, 31 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 46 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-05556-KMK, 32 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK, 37 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 33 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 38 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 58 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 34 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 21 in 7:15-cv-06107-KMK, 31 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 32 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-05556-KMK, 46 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 36 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 37 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 39 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK) FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017. FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017 filed by Ford Motor Co., Ford Motor Company. Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(ama) Modified on 8/15/2017 (ama).
|
| Set/Reset Deadlines: Ford Motor Company answer due 9/13/2017. (ama) |
| Filing 21 FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017., FIRST LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time and Extension to File Class Certification Motion addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Peter J. Fazio, Counsel for Ford Motor Company dated August 13, 2017. Document filed by Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, Ford Motor Co., Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Stipulation Order Extending Time to Answer and to File Motion)Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(Fazio, Peter) |
|
Filing 20
OPINION & ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant is directed to file an Answer to the SAC within 20 days from the date of this Opinion. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close case numbers 13-CV-906, 13-CV-1144, 13-CV-4099, 13-CV-4101, 13-CV-4150, 13-CV-4235, 13-CV-4236, 13-CV-4237, 13-CV-4242, 13-CV-4243, 13-CV-4316, 13-CV-4318, 13-CV-4611, 13-CV-4612, 13-CV-5556, and 15-CV-6107, terminate the pending Motion (Dkt. No. 100), and dismiss all Plaintiffs, except for Richard Pitkin, Dennis Harkins, Gregory Holman, and Leah Broome. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 7/24/2017) (mml)
|
|
Filing 19
MEMO ENDORSEMENT: on re: (139 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK) Letter, filed by Rick Wright, Richard Fox, William Huff, Kelly Wolverton, James DeVito, Angela Boykin, Douglas McVay, Allen Bluhm, Lawrence Moss, Dennis Harkins, Naomi Teppich, Stanley Lindsey, Jeremie Kahler, Dewayne McDaniel, Gary Druckenmiller, Nan Le-Khanh Lewis, Burneta Barley, Lori Schneider, Donna Stimmel, Guy Mossman, Nathan Montijo, Michael Tannhauser, Charles Savage, Lori Zafonte, Kermit Wilkins, Steven Yamin, Matthew Romak, Dean Wilkins, Johanna Fontenot, Robert Renteria, Gregory Yorton, Stephen Brand, Mark Goodale, Jeremy Dobbs, Martin Springhetti, Gary Zack, Leo Rowe, Patricia Lazuka, Young Kwun, Michael W McComas, Peter Patroni, Dean Majkrzak, Bruce Klafter, Keith Howe, Adele Rovetto, Leah Broome, Sylvester Lazuka, Michel Jocelyn, Alfonso Lerma, April Tibbetts, Michael Hendrickson, Dave Deluca, Christian Nielsen, Pedro Magana, Susan Pliner, Sandra Wright, Elizabeth Lindsey, Charles Zafonte, Richard Weglarz, James Griffiths, Amber Kahler, Gregory Holman, Matthew Parkhurst, Marianne Cibeu, Raymond Belden, Phillip Rider, Neal Schneider, Roger Ritten, Richard Pitkin, C Diane Sikes, James Oldcorn, Angel Rivera, Claudia McDaniel, Gary Cole, Robert Fellows, Octavio Hoyos, L David Sikes. ENDORSEMENT: Granted. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 6/26/2017) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(ama)
|
|
Filing 18
SECOND AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is to be tried to a jury. No additional parties may be joined except with leave of the Court. Amended pleadings may not be filed except with leave of the Court. Depositions due by 1/26/2017. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 1/20/2017) (SEE ORDER AS SET FORTH) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. (lnl)
|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Kenneth M. Karas: Interim Pretrial Conference held on 1/12/2017. Elaine Kusel appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. Peter Fazio and David George appeared on behalf of Defendant. Angela O'Donnell served as court reporter. For the reasons stated on the record, the discovery requests Plaintiffs make in their November 17, 2016 letter (Dkt. No. 125), are denied. (Court Reporter Angela O'Donnell) Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(BF) |
|
Filing 17
JOINT ORDER FOR CLARIFICATION OF THE STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR NON-PARTIES re: (23 in 7:13-cv-04237-KMK, 26 in 7:13-cv-00906-KMK, 28 in 7:13-cv-04242-KMK, 26 in 7:13-cv-04318-KMK, 29 in 7:13-cv-04099-KMK, 66 in 7:13-md-02450-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-04101-KMK, 37 in 7:13-cv-04150-KMK, 29 in 7:13-cv-04243-KMK, 21 in 7:13-cv-04611-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-04235-KMK, 22 in 7:13-cv-01144-KMK, 28 in 7:13-cv-04316-KMK, 48 in 7:13-cv-04152-KMK, 24 in 7:13-cv-04612-KMK, 24 in 7:13-cv-04102-KMK, 12 in 7:13-cv-05556-KMK, 23 in 7:13-cv-04236-KMK) Protective Order. On December 12, 2013, this Court entered a Stipulated Protective Order in this case "[i]n order to preserve and maintain the confidentiality of certain confidential, commercial and/or proprietary documents produced in this action" [Dkt. No. 66]. The Protective Order ("Order") applied to documents that "a party" sought to designate as confidential, and outlined the rights of the entity producing the documents. (See, e.g., 2(a), 2(c)). Most portions of the Order used the term "producing party" rather than "party." Id. at 6(b), 7(c), 9, and 11(c). The intent of the Order was to extend beyond the parties to this lawsuit and apply to any "producing entity," including any non-party responding to discovery. (Note the use of the term "designating party or non-party" in Paragraph 3(a)). To the extent the Order was unclear, the Court clarifies that a "producing party" or "designating party" need not be a party in this lawsuit, but can be any entity responding to discovery in this case. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 8/7/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(yv)
|
|
Filing 16
ORDER FOR ADMISSION PRO HAC VICE in case 7:13-cv-00906-KMK; granting (102) Motion for Emily J. Kirk to Appear Pro Hac Vice in case 7:13-md-02450-KMK. The motion of EMILY J. KIRK, for admission to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned action is granted. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Applicant is admitted to practice Pro Hac Vice in the above-captioned case in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. All attorneys appearing before this Court are subject to the Local Rules of this Court, including the Rules governing discipline of attorneys. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 4/20/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. (yv)
|
|
Filing 15
STIPULATED ORDER GOVERNING THE PRODUCTION OF ELECTRONICALLY STORED AND OTHER INFORMATION: It is ORDERED as follows: I. IDENTIFICATION OF CUSTODIANS AND LOCATION OF INFORMATION. A. Custodians. Ford Motor Company ("Ford") agrees to provide a reasonable and proportional list of document custodians that it has identified as potentially containing relevant documents. If the Parties agree to stagger discovery (e.g., by issue, category of information, etc.) the custodian list will be updated within a reasonable time shortly thereafter as the Parties proceed to the next agreed upon stage of discovery. The custodian list will include a description of the proposed custodians' job title and a brief description of such person's relevant responsibilities (including relevant dates of employment by the applicable party). The parties retain the right, upon reviewing the initial production of documents, and conducting other investigation and discovery, to request that files from additional custodians be searched and to meet and confer regarding such requests. B. Location of Information. Ford may support its claims and defenses using hard copy documents and ESI including, but not limited to, email and electronic documents such as those created with Microsoft Office, and with certain engineering or manufacturing applications. Hard-copy documents may be located in various locations throughout Ford (see Section II below for production format details). ESI may be located in employee laptop/desktop hard drives, various tile and print servers, email servers, portable media (such as CDs and DVDs), mainframe computers, electronic document repositories, proprietary databases, and application databases. In addition to the custodian identification described above, the parties will identify and describe any relevant, non-privileged electronic systems and storage locations that may contain information proportionate and relevant to the claims and/or defenses. If the Parties agree to stagger discovery (e.g., by issue, category of information, etc.), the identification and description of sources will be updated within a reasonable time shortly thereafter as the Parties proceed to the next agreed upon stage of discovery. C. Easily Segregable Documents. Documents or categories of documents that are easily identifiable and segregable shall be collected without the use of search terms or other agreed upon advanced search methodology (e.g. analytics, predictive coding, technology-assisted-review). Where potentially responsive ESI shall be searched through the use of search terms, if any, the parties agree to follow the process identified below and the parties shall meet and confer regarding any proposed deviation. D. Search Terms. Where the Parties agree that identifying potentially responsive ESI through the use of search terms is appropriate, the parties will provide the list of search terms used or proposed to filter data to the opposing party. To the extent reasonably possible, search terms will be crafted with input from the custodians in order to identify appropriate nomenclature, code words, etc. Within 7 days of the producing party's identification of search terms, the receiving party shall propose any additional terms that the party reasonably believes would yield responsive, relevant documents. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the proposed search terms within five business days of receipt of the additional search terms and attempt to reach a compromise within one week. The use of a search term hit list, proposal of alternate terms and/or other reasonable methods shall be used, as appropriate, in order to attempt to agree upon any modifications to the set of search terms. If disputed terms still exist at the end of the meet and confer process, the parties will submit those terms to the Court in the form of a joint discovery letter with a discussion of the relevance and/or burden associated with those search terms. The inclusion of this paragraph should not be construed as an agreement that search terms are necessary or required to identify potentially responsive ESI. E. Technology Assisted Review. No party shall use predictive coding/technology-assisted review for the purpose of culling out documents from the review population without written consent of the opposing party or an order from the court and assumes that the parties will negotiate a separate mutually agreeable protocol for the use of such technologies. II. PRODUCTION OF HARD COPY DOCUMENTS. A. Format. Except as noted below, hard copy documents not otherwise converted to another format should be scanned as single-page, Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with an.opt image cross reference file and a delimited database load file (i.e. .dat). The database load file should contain the following fields: "BEGNO", "ENDNO", "PAGES", "VOLUME" and "CUSTODIAN." The documents should be logically unitized (i.e. distinct documents shall not be merged into a single record, and single documents shall not be split into multiple records) and be produced, where reasonably feasible, in the order in which they are kept in the usual course of business. If an original document contains color to understand the meaning or content of the document, the document shall be produced as single-page, 300 DPI JPG images with JPG compression and a high quality setting as to not degrade the original image. Multi-page OCR text for each document should also be provided. The OCR software shall maximize text quality over process speed, where reasonably feasible. Settings such as "auto-skewing" and "auto-rotation" should be turned on during the OCR process. Parties are under no obligation to enhance an image beyond how it was kept in the usual course of business. If producing the hard copy documents in the above format creates an undue burden that exceeds the benefit (for example, if applying OCR to the documents is expensive and/or of marginal utility or if logically unitizing the documents creates an undue burden), the parties will meet and confer regarding an alternative format, such as making the documents available in hard copy, as they were kept in the ordinary course of business. III. PRODUCTION OF ESI. A. Format. The parties will produce ESI in single-page, black and white, TIFF Group IV, 300 DPI TIFF images with the exception of spreadsheet type files, Excel files, audio, and video files, which shall be produced in native format. TIFFS will show any and all text and images which would be visible to the reader using the native software that created the document, where reasonably feasible. For example, TIFFS of email messages should include the BCC line. PowerPoint documents shall be processed with hidden slides and all speaker notes unhidden, and shall be processed to show both the slide and the speaker's notes on the TIFF image. If an original document contains color and a color version is needed to understand the meaning and content of the document, the document should be produced either in native format, or as single page, 300 DPI JPG images with JPG compression and a high quality setting as to not degrade the original image. Parties are under no obligation to enhance an image beyond how it was kept in the usual course of business. If a document is produced in native format, a single page bates stamped image slip-sheet stating the document has been produced in native format will also be provided. Each native file should be named according to the Bates number it has been assigned, and should be linked directly to its corresponding record in the load file using the NATIVELINK field. To the extent that either party believes that specific documents or classes of documents, not already identified within this protocol, should be produced in native format, the parties agree to meet and confer in good faith. B. De-Duplication. Each party may remove exact duplicate documents based on MD5 or SHA-1 hash values, at the family level. Attachments should not be eliminated as duplicates for purposes of production, unless the parent email and all attachments are also duplicates. Parties agree that an email that includes content in the BCC or other blind copy field shall not be treated as a duplicate of an email that does not include content in those fields, even if all remaining content in the email is identical. The parties do not currently agree to removal of near-duplicates. If a party seeks to modify this agreement (e.g. removal of duplicative, non-inclusive e-mail threads and other de-duplication techniques), the party must do so such that it will not cause an unreasonable delay in production. The party will promptly request a meet and confer, prior to production, and with ample opportunity for the receiving party to seek court intervention if the parties are not able to come to a mutual agreement. De-duplication may be done across the entire collection (global de-duplication), but if it is done across the entire collection, a Duplicate Custodian field will be provided, which will include, for each document, the names of the custodians whose data was deduplicated in processing for that document. Should the custodian metadata field produced become outdated due to rolling productions, an overlay file providing all the custodians for the affected documents will be produced prior to substantial completion of the document production. If the receiving party identifies a document or a select number of documents for which the file path is purportedly relevant to the issues, the parties agree to meet and confer about providing file path metadata for such a limited population of documents. C. Metadata. All ESI will be produced with a delimited, database load file that contains the metadata fields listed in Table 1, where reasonably available, attached hereto. D. Embedded Objects The parties agree that embedded documents will be separated out as attachments unless it causes inefficiencies or an undue burden and in that case, will meet and confer regarding the issue. E. Compressed Files Types. Compressed file types (i.e. .ZIP,.RAR,.CAB,.Z) should be decompressed so that the lowest level document or file is extracted, where reasonably feasible. F. Structured Data
|
|
Filing 14
CASE MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULING ORDER: This case is to be tried to a jury. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification shall be filed no later than 10/12/2016. Ford's Response shall be filed no later than 12/14/2016. Plaintiffs' Reply shall be filed no later than 2/16/2017. Deposition related to Phase 1 to be completed by 8/1/2016. Phase 1 Fact Discovery is to be completed no later than August 1, 2016, and the deadline for all fact discovery is due by 3/16/2017. Initial disclosure pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P., will be completed no later than 3/25/2016. The parties do not request a settlement conference before a United States Magistrate Judge. The parties do not request that the case be referred to the Court's Mediation Program. The parties will consider use a privately-retained mediator at a later date. The last day for mediation is March 16, 2017. Remand of these multi-district proceedings is required before trial. There will be no extensions of the discovery schedule without the permission of the Court, nor should counsel assume that any extensions will be granted. Counsel may seek permission for an extension of the discovery deadline of the magistrate judge to whom the case is referred, but only after consenting to allowing the magistrate judge handle the case for all purposes. Next Case Management Conference set for 10/13/2016 at 11:30 AM before Judge Kenneth M. Karas. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/8/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(yv)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendant shall submit its Motion to Dismiss by no later than April 1, 2016. Plaintiffs shall file their response by May 2, 2016. Defendant shall submit its reply by no later than June 2, 2016. Sur-reply papers will not be accepted unless prior permission of the Court is given. So Ordered. (Motions due by 4/1/2016. Responses due by 5/2/2016. Replies due by 6/2/2016.) (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 2/11/16) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al.(yv) Modified on 2/11/2016 (yv).
|
|
Filing 12
OPINION AND ORDER: Defendant's Motion To Dismiss is granted in part and denied in part. To the extent that Plaintiffs make claims based on the mere use of EPA fuel economy estimates in advertisements or on Monroney Stickers, those claims are dismissed because they are preempted by federal law and, in any event, fail to state a claim. Additionally, Plaintiffs' MMW A claim and unjust enrichment claim under California and New York law are dismissed. The Clerk is respectfully requested to terminate the Motion. (Dkt. No. 63.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 11/12/2015) Filed In Associated Cases: 7:13-md-02450-KMK et al. (lnl) (Main Document 82 replaced on 11/17/2015) (mml). (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/17/2015: #1 Part 2) (mml)
|
| Filing 11 MDL TRANSFERRED IN from the United States District Court - District of California Central; Case Number: 2:15-cv-05432. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket entries received. (sjo) |
| CASE ACCEPTED AS RELATED. Create association to 7:13-md-02450-KMK. (sjo) |
| CONSOLIDATED MDL CASE: Create association to 7:13-md-02450-KMK. (sjo) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sjo) |
| NOTE TO OUT OF STATE ATTORNEYS: Please visit the Court's website at http://www.nysd.uscourts.gov for information regarding admission to the S.D.N.Y. Bar and the CM/ECF Rules & Filing Instructions. (sjo) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. (sjo) |
| Filing 10 CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-4) from the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, MDL 2450, transferring case to USDC, Southern District of New York for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings, and with the consent of that court, assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Case electronically transferred. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (gk) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
| Filing 9 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Ford Motor Company answer now due 8/23/2015, filed by defendant Ford Motor Company.(Hansen, Ryan) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER SETTING INITIAL STATUS CONFERENCE for 8/17/2015 at 03:00 PM before Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.]
|
|
Filing 7
NEW CASE ORDER upon filing of the complaint by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. (pc) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.]
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Stephen V. Wilson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (jp) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
| Filing 5 NOTICE filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. Notice of Pendency of Other Actions or Proceedings (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Hansen, Ryan) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by defendant Ford Motor Company, re Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 served on 7/17/15. (Hansen, Ryan) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant Ford Motor Company, identifying State Street Bank and Trust Company. (Hansen, Ryan) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Hansen, Ryan) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, case number BC583666 Receipt No: 0973-16101025 - Fee: $400, filed by defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Ryan T Hansen added to party Ford Motor Company(pty:dft))(Hansen, Ryan) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ORIGINAL FILED COMPLAINT against Defendants Ford Motor Company, Does 1-50, Inclusive. Jury Demand, filed by plaintiff Dave Deluca. (FILED IN STATE COURT ON 6/1/2015 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ). (jp) [Transferred from California Central on 8/4/2015.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
