Tardibuono-Quigley v. HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA) et al
|HSBC Mortgage Corporation (USA), HSBC Bank USA, N.A., PHH Corporation and PHH Mortgage Corporation
|September 2, 2015
|US District Court for the Southern District of New York
|White Plains Office
|Kenneth M. Karas
|Nature of Suit:
|Other Statutory Actions
|Cause of Action:
|28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Other
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 21, 2020
JUDGMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED: 1. The Settlement Agreement is incorporated by reference in this Judgment as though fully set forth herein. All capitalized terms used herein shall have the meanings set fort h in the Settlement Agreement. Class Counsel are hereby awarded attorneys' fees of $817,500.00 and expense reimbursement in the amount of $133,394.19 (collectively, "Class Counsel Fees"), which sums the Court finds to be fair and reasonable. In making this award, the Court has considered and found that: The Class Notice advised that Class Counsel would move for an award of attorneys' fees of no more than $817,500.00 and reimbursement of expenses of no more than $135,000.00, which Defendants would not challenge, and no objections were filed against the terms of the proposed Settlement or the ceiling on the award of attorneys' fees and expenses disclosed in the Class Notice. T he Court finds that an award to the Class Representative for her time and effort in representing the Class in the prosecution of the Action is fair and reasonable, and thus awards her a Service Award in the amount of $5,000.00. Without fur ther order of the Court, the parties may agree to reasonable extensions of time to carry out any of the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. There is no just reason for delay in the entry of this Order and Judgment and immediate entry by the Clerk of the Court is expressly directed. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 5/21/2020) (jca)
|May 13, 2020
NOTICE OF TELECONFERENCE INFORMATION: For the week of May 18, 2020, the Court will hold all civil conferences, hearings, and/or oral arguments by telephone. Counsel shall call the following number at the designated time: Meeting Dial-In Number (USA toll-free): (888) 363-4749 Access Code: 7702195Please enter the conference as a guest by pressing the pound sign (#). Given that much of the Court is operating remotely and has limited mail capability, counsel involved in any pro se cases shall mail a copy of this Notice to or otherwise inform the pro se party of the above teleconference information. Counsel in any pro se inmate cases shall ensure that the pro se party is on the line before calling the above-referenced number. For initia l conferences, counsel shall submit a proposed case management and discovery schedule via ECF by 5 p.m. on the evening before the initial conference. Any requests for adjournments should be filed as soon as possible and clearly explain why the conference should be adjourned. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 5/13/2020) (jca)
|March 30, 2017
AMENDED OPINION & ORDER: PHH's Motion is granted in full, and the HSBC Defendants' Motion is granted in part and denied in part. The only claims remaining are the breach of contract and GBL claims against HSBC Mortgage. HSBC Mortgage sh all file an Answer within 30 days from the date of this Opinion. The Clerk of Court is direct to terminate the pending Motions, (Dkt. Nos. 46, 49), and dismiss Defendants HSBC Bank and PHH from the case. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/30/2017) (lnl)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?