Lu v. Nails By Ann, Inc. et al
| JianJing Lu |
| Nails By Ann, Inc., Sung Byun, Myong Hee Kim and John Does |
| 7:2015cv08906 |
| November 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Queens |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
48
OPINION AND ORDER re: 44 MOTION for Attorney Fees . filed by JianJing Lu. Plaintiff's unopposed motion for an award of attorneys' fees and costs (Doc. #44) is GRANTED, for substantially the reasons set forth in the memorand um of law submitted in support of the motion. First, plaintiff was almost completely successful on her claims. Moreover, having carefully reviewed the declarations submitted by Mr. Stein and Mr. Wong, and the attached contemporaneous time records and invoices documenting litigation costs, the Court finds reasonable and appropriate the hours expended on the litigation for which plaintiff requests compensation, the requested hourly rates, and the out-of-pocket litigation costs incurred. Acco rdingly, in addition to the amounts awarded to plaintiff for actual, liquidated, and statutory damages, as well as for prejudgment interest, the Court will allow reasonable attorneys' fees in the amount of $35,441.25 and costs of the acti on in the amount of $2,163.28. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #44). The Court will separately enter a Judgment as against defendants Nails by Ann, Inc. d/b/a Nail House, and Myong Hee Kim. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 4/19/18) (yv)
|
|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER re: 37 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by JianJing Lu. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. By September 19, 2017, plaintiff shall submit (i) her properly documented application for attor ney's fees and costs, and (ii) a proposed judgment, leaving a blank space for the amount of attorney's fees and costs. By October 3, 2017, defendants' shall submit their opposition, if any, to the application for attorney's fee s and costs, and a counter-proposed judgment, if any. The Clerk is instructed to terminate the motion. (Doc. #37). The Clerk is further instructed to terminate defendant Sung Byun. SO ORDERED., (Sung Byun terminated.), (Motions due by 9/19/2017., Responses due by 10/3/2017) (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 9/1/17) (yv)
|
|
Filing
26
OPINION: By September 23, 2016, the parties shall submit a joint letter regarding the status of the case and advising the Court of how best to proceed. Counsel shall appear by telephone for a status conference on September 30, 2016, at 10:00 am. Plaintiff's counsel shall initiate the call. The chambers telephone number is (914)390-4166.( Telephone Status Conference set for 9/30/2016 at 10:00 AM before Judge Vincent L. Briccetti.) (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 6/2/2016) (rj)
|
|
Filing
25
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re: 24 JOINT LETTER MOTION to Adjourn Conference addressed to Judge Vincent L. Briccetti from David Stein, Esq. dated May 31, 2016, filed by JianJing Lu, 16 MOTION to Certify Class (FLSA Collectiv e Action), filed by JianJing Lu. Plaintiff's motion for conditional certification of a collective action is GRANTED. The joint motion to adjourn the June 2, 2016, conference is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to terminate the motions. (Docs. ##16, 24). (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 6/1/2016) (rj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
