Mastromonaco v. County Of Westchester et al
| Derek Mastromonaco |
| County Of Westchester, Timothy Joyce, George Winsman, Robert Pavone, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, John Doe No. 3 and Town of Cortlandt |
| 7:2015cv10166 |
| December 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| Westchester |
| Vincent L. Briccetti |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
104
OPINION AND ORDER re: 88 MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by Derek Mastromonaco, 89 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment . filed by George Winsman, Robert Pavone, Timothy Joyce, County Of Westchester. Plaintiff 9;s motion for partial summary judgment is DENIED. Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to plaintiff's excessive force claim against Officer Joyce, and GRANTED in all other respects. The Clerk is instructed to term inate the motions. (Docs. ##88, 89). All counsel are directed to appear at a status conference on October 5, 2018, at 9:15 a.m., at which time the Court will set a trial date and a schedule for pretrial submissions. By September 24, 2018, the parties shall submit a Joint Pretrial Order in accordance with the Court's Individual Practices. (Status Conference set for 10/5/2018 at 09:15 AM before Judge Vincent L. Briccetti.) (Signed by Judge Vincent L. Briccetti on 8/23/2018) (rro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
