Black v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Thomas Black |
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, CSX Transportation Inc., CSX Intermodal Terminals, Inc. and CSX Realty Development, LLC |
7:2016cv00657 |
January 28, 2016 |
US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
White Plains Office |
XX Out of State |
Nelson Stephen Roman |
Other Personal Injury |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1396 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 81 ORDER. Thomas Black ("Plaintiff") is the natural father of Noah Thomas Black, who deceased on January 31, 2015. Plaintiff was appointed as the administrator of his son's estate and brought this action, with demand for jury trial, on Ja nuary 28, 2016 to recover for his son's injuries and death. (Complaint, ECF No. 1.) The claims arise under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The parties recently notified the Court that they have reached a settlement agreem ent with regards to the lawsuit, and that they will be submitting their settlement papers shortly. Accordingly, the Court presently DENIES Defendant's motion for partial summary judgment as moot. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully requested to terminate the motion at ECF No. 70. SO ORDERED. Denying as moot 70 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 12/20/2018) (rjm) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.