Keswin v. Finger Lakes Capital Partners LLC et al
| Keswin and Jeffrey Keswin |
| Finger Lakes Capital Partners LLC, Gregory Shalov and V. Zubin Mehta |
| 7:2016cv01585 |
| March 1, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of New York |
| White Plains Office |
| New York |
| Kenneth M Karas |
| Negotiable Instrument |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1452 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
DUPLICATE ORIGINAL AMENDED STANDING ORDER REFERRING CASE to Bankruptcy Court as related to Bankruptcy Court Case No. 16-22112(RDD). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 157(a) any or all cases under title 11 and any or all proceedings arising under title 11 or arising in or related to a case under title 11 are referred to the bankruptcy judges for this district. (See 1:12-mc-00032 (M-10-468) Order Filed February 1, 2012) (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 1/31/12) (yv) Modified on 3/9/2016 (yv).
|
|
Filing 5
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: #4 Letter filed by Finger Lakes Capital Partners LLC. ENDORSEMENT: Having received no opposition to this application, it is granted. This matter is referred to the Bankruptcy Court. So Ordered. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M. Karas on 3/8/16) (yv)
|
| Filing 4 LETTER addressed to Judge Kenneth M. Karas from Julie Cvek Curley, Esq. dated March 2, 2016 re: Transfer of Case to Bankruptcy Court. Document filed by Finger Lakes Capital Partners LLC.(Cvek, Julie) |
| CASE TRANSFERRED OUT from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of New York to the United States Bankruptcy Court - Southern District of New York. (yv) |
| Case Designated ECF. (sj) |
| Magistrate Judge Paul E. Davison is so designated. (sj) |
| CASE OPENING INITIAL ASSIGNMENT NOTICE: The above-entitled action is assigned to Judge Kenneth M. Karas. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned District Judge, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/judges/District. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Please download and review the ECF Rules and Instructions, located at #http://nysd.uscourts.gov/ecf_filing.php. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING CASE OPENING STATISTICAL ERROR CORRECTION: Notice to attorney Julie Anna Cvek. The following case opening statistical information was erroneously selected/entered: County code Westchester. The following correction(s) have been made to your case entry: the County code has been modified to New York. (sj) |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT PLEADING. Notice to Attorney Julie Anna Cvek to RE-FILE Document No. #1 Notice of Removal. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Defendant's name incorrectly spelled on PDF AND Notice of Removal not signed by filing attorney. Re-file the pleading using the event type Notice of Removal found under the event list Complaints and Other Initiating Documents - attach the correct signed PDF - select the individually named filer/filers - select the individually named party/parties the pleading is against. (sj) Modified on 3/2/2016 (sj). |
| ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET. Notice to attorney Julie Anna Cvek to RE-FILE Document No. #3 Civil Cover Sheet. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): Civil Cover Sheet not signed by filing attorney. Re-file the document using the event type Civil Cover Sheet found under the event list Other Documents and attach the correct PDF. Use civil cover sheet issued by S.D.N.Y. dated April 2014. The S.D.N.Y. Civil Cover Sheet dated April 2014 is located at#http://nysd.uscourts.gov/file/forms/civil-cover-sheet. (sj) |
| Filing 3 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT CIVIL COVER SHEET CIVIL COVER SHEET filed. (Cvek, Julie) Modified on 3/2/2016 (sj). |
| Filing 2 RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. No Corporate Parent. Document filed by Finger Lakes Capital Partners LLC.(Cvek, Julie) |
| Filing 1 FILING ERROR - DEFICIENT PLEADING NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Supreme Court, County of New York. Case Number: 156356-15. (Filing Fee $ 400.00, Receipt Number 0208-12017267).Document filed by Finger Lakes Capital Partners LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Notice of Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #2 Exhibit 1 - Affidavit in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #3 Exhibit 1 - Memorandum in Support Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #4 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit A to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #5 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit B to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #6 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit C to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #7 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit D to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #8 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit E to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #9 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit F to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #10 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit G to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #11 Exhibit 1 - Exhibit H to Motion for Summary Judgment in Lieu of Complaint, #12 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #13 Exhibit 2 - Affidavit in Support of Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #14 Exhibit 2 - Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #15 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit A to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #16 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit A to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay (Part 2 of 2), #17 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit B to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #18 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit C to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #19 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit D to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #20 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit E to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #21 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit F to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #22 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit G to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #23 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit H to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #24 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit I to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #25 Exhibit 2 - Exhibit J to Cross-Motion to Dismiss or Stay, #26 Exhibit 3 - Affirmation in Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #27 Exhibit 3 - Memorandum in Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #28 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit A to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #29 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit B to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #30 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit C to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #31 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit C to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #32 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit D to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #33 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit E to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #34 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit F to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #35 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit G to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #36 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit H to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #37 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit I to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #38 Exhibit 3 - Exhibit J to Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment and Opposition to Cross-Motion to Dismiss, #39 Exhibit 4 - Decision and Order Staying Proceeding, #40 Exhibit 5 - Decision and Order Denying Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross-Motion to Dismiss)(Cvek, Julie) Modified on 3/2/2016 (sj). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
