Williams v. Noell et al
Plaintiff: Kenneth J. Williams
Defendant: C. Noell, Mid Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Center, Michelle Winkham, Hernandez and La Forge
Case Number: 1:2016cv02188
Filed: March 22, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Office: Foley Square Office
County: Suffolk
Presiding Judge: Loretta A. Preska
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 149 DECISION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 129 Motion for Summary Judgment. For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 129) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. An in-person status conference is hereby scheduled for October 19, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 250 in the White Plains federal courthouse. In advance of the conference, counsel must meet and confer to discuss potential trial dates between February and May 2023. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 9/16/2022) (tg)
October 20, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER: The Court received a letter dated October 15, 2020 from counsel requesting that the deadline for depositions be extended for 60 days, to be completed by December 15, 2020. Dkt. # 111. The request for an extension is granted. As the prior dead line for the completion of all discovery has passed, the parties are directed to submit a proposed revised scheduling order by November 16, 2020. This proposed order should contain proposed deadlines for all remaining discovery in this matter. (Deposition due by 12/15/2020.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrew E. Krause on 10/20/2020) (nb)
March 26, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 105 ORDER granting 104 Letter Motion to Adjourn Conference. Application Granted. Clerk of the Court requested to terminate the motion (doc. 104). (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/26/2020) (rj)
December 27, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER: The review of the submitted records has been completed, and I am satisfied that there are no documents in the personnel records which are relevant and material for purposes of discovery. I note in particular that there are no documents evide ncing any complaints, investigations, or discipline involving claims of harm to patients by these defendants. Therefore none of those documents needs to be produced. I conclude that the investigative files, along with a copy of the CD, must be produ ced promptly to Plaintiff's counsel. The documents to be produced to Plaintiff's counsel must be properly certified, so that they may be used as evidence at trial pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 902(11). Counsel for Defendants is direc ted to make legible copies of the identified documents and produce them to counsel within 14 calendar days of the date of this Order. Counsel for all parties are reminded of the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a) in the event that any documents are filed in this matter. The Clerk is directed to return the records to counsel for the Defendants along with a copy of this Order. (And as further set forth herein.) SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 12/27/2019) (jca) Transmission to Docket Assistant Clerk for processing. Transmission to Records Management Clerk for processing.
November 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 92 ORDER granting 91 Letter Motion for Discovery. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an Assistant Attorney General in the Office of the New York State Attorney General may take the deposition of Kenneth J. Williams, by a notary public, or some other office r authorized to administer oaths by the laws of the United States or of the State of New York, in person or by audiovisual remote means, at the Suffolk County Sheriffs Office Riverhead Correctional Facility located at 100 Center Drive South, Riverhead, New York 119018, upon notice to Plaintiff and the Suffolk County Sheriffs Office. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Lisa Margaret Smith on 11/12/2019) (rj)
March 27, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 54 OPINION AND ORDER: For the foregoing reasons, Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The motion is granted to dismiss Mid-Hudson. The motion is denied insofar as it requests dis missal for insufficient service, as the Court finds good cause to grant leave to re-serve. Plaintiff is hereby granted an extension to re-serve the Summons and Complaint on Defendants Noell, Wickham, Hernandez, and Laforge within 30 days of the dat e of this Opinion. An Order of Service directing the Marshals to assist Plaintiff in this matter, as he is pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, will be issued in short order. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to terminate the motion at ECF No. 28. The Clerk of Court is further directed to terminate Defendant Mid-Hudson, as the action against Mid-Hudson is barred by operation of sovereign immunity. SO ORDERED. Mid Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Center terminated. (Signed by Judge Nelson Stephen Roman on 3/27/2018) Copies Mailed By Chambers. (rj)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. Noell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kenneth J. Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: C. Noell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mid Hudson Forensic Psychiatric Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Michelle Winkham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: La Forge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?