Canale v. Colgate-Palmolive Co.
||May 3, 2016
||US District Court for the Southern District of New York
||White Plains Office
||XX Out of State
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1332
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 23, 2017
OPINION & ORDER re: 26 MOTION to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) filed by Colgate-Palmolive Co. Before the Court is Defendant's motion to dismiss or stay the case. (Doc. 26.) (As further set forth in this Order.) For the reasons stated above, Defendant's motion to dismiss the case is DENIED. This case is STAYED until the conclusion of the FTC's investigation. Defendant is to provide status updates every six months (and promptly upon the conclusion of the FTC inquiry). The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate the pending motion. (Doc. 26.) (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 6/23/2017) (cf)
|January 10, 2017
OPINION & ORDER. I hereby renounce my membership in the putative class and waive any claim I may have arising from the representations made with respect to the toothpastes whitening capability. Accordingly, for the reasons stated above, I find that recusal is not required. The parties are to brief Defendants motion to dismiss pursuant to the briefing schedule set forth at the December 1, 2016 conference. Any party contemplating any other motions at this time, including a motion to stay discovery or to transfer the case, should submit a pre-motion letter pursuant to my Individual Practices. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Cathy Seibel on 1/10/17) (yv)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?